Darʾ Taʿâroud al-ʿAql wa-n-NaqlIbn Taimiya

[The fifth]

The fifth perspective:

We demonstrate that sound, clear rational proofs about which there is no doubt—indeed, innate, self-evident knowledge—agree with what the messengers have conveyed and do not contradict it. All sound rational proofs agree with transmitted revelation and contradict nothing in it. Praise be to Allah, I have examined this in what the various schools have put forward, and have found that no member of any school of speculative thinkers engaged in rational inquiry adduces, on any question, a sound proof that contradicts what the messengers have conveyed. Rather, it agrees with it.

Even the philosophers who maintain that the world is eternal, such as Aristotle and his followers, adduce no sound rational proof that contradicts what the messengers have conveyed; rather, it agrees with it. The same holds for all other schools of speculative thinkers, whether proponents of negation or affirmation: whenever they adduce a rational proof on any question, whatever is sound in it agrees with revelation rather than contradicting it.

This establishes in detail that clear rational knowledge does not contradict what the prophets have conveyed, as we shall discuss in its proper place, Allah willing. We shall also show that those who oppose the prophets make use of neither reason nor hearing, as Allah, Most High, has said of them:

“Every time a group is thrown into it, its keepers will ask them, ‘Did no warner come to you?’ They will say, ‘Yes, a warner did come to us, but we denied him and said, “Allah has sent down nothing; you are only in great error.”’ And they will say, ‘If only we had listened or reasoned, we would not be among the companions of the Blaze.’ Thus they will acknowledge their sin. So away with the companions of the Blaze!”

[Al-Mulk: 8–11]

We shall then present further perspectives demonstrating the invalidity of this principle, which those who deviate from the truth use to reject what Allah and His Messenger have said. We say:

[الخامس] الوجه الخامس: أن نبين أن الأدلة العقلية الصحيحة البينة التي لا ريب فيها، بل العلوم الفطرية الضرورية، توافق ما أخبرت به الرسل لا تخالفه، وأن الأدلة العقلية الصحيحة جميعها موافقة للسمع، لا تخالف شيئاً من السمع، وهذا ـ ولله الحمد ـ قد اعتبرته فيما ذكره عامة الطوائف، فوجدت كل طائفة من طوائف النظار أهل العقليات لا يذكر أحد منهم في مسألة ما دليلاً صحيحاً يخالف ما أخبرت به الرسل، بل يوافقه، حتى الفلاسفة القائلين بقدم العالم كأرسطو وأتباعه: ما يذكرونه من دليل صحيح عقلي، فإنه لا يخالف ما أخبرت به الرسل، بل يوافقه، وكذلك سائر طوائف النظار من أهل النفي والإثبات، لا يذكرن دليلاً عقلياً في مسألة إلا والصحيح منه موافق لا مخالف. وهذا يعلم به أن المعقول الصريح ليس مخالفاً لأخبار الأنبياء علي وجه التفصيل، كما نذكره إن شاء الله في موضعه، ونبين أن من خالف الأنبياء فليس لهم عقل ولا سمع، كما أخبر الله عنهم بقوله تعالي {كلما ألقي فيها فوج سألهم خزنتها ألم يأتكم نذير * قالوا بلى قد جاءنا نذير فكذبنا وقلنا ما نزل الله من شيء إن أنتم إلا في ضلال كبير * وقالوا لو كنا نسمع أو نعقل ما كنا في أصحاب السعير * فاعترفوا بذنبهم فسحقا لأصحاب السعير} [الملك: ٨-١١] . ثم نذكر وجوها أخر لبيان فساد هذا الأصل الذي يتوسل به أهل الإلحاد إلي رد ما قاله الله ورسوله فنقول:

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies