except a body.”
The one who affirms the attributes replies:
“Nothing possessing life, knowledge, power, hearing, sight, speech, and will can be conceived of except a body. If you may affirm these attributes and say that the One possessing them is not a body, then I too may affirm those attributes while maintaining that the One possessing them is not a body. Thus, one may affirm a being designated by these names who is not a body.”
If he says, “These are qualities, whereas those are parts,” he replies:
“Pleasure, anger, love, and hatred are qualities. As for the hand and face—even if they are parts—hearing, sight, and speech are accidents that subsist only in a body. If you may affirm them while maintaining that they are not accidents and that the One in whom they subsist is not a body, then I may affirm these while maintaining that they are not parts.”
If the one who denies the attributes says, “I affirm none of them,” he replies:
“You have left the names undefined. You say that He is living, knowing, and powerful, yet you cannot conceive of anything living, knowing, and powerful except a body. You also say that He is not a body. If you may affirm a being designated by these names who is not a body, although you cannot conceive of this, then I may affirm One possessing these attributes, although I cannot conceive of this.”
If the heretic says, “I deny both the names and the attributes,” he is told:
“Either you acknowledge that this observable world is something produced and made, with a maker who brought it into being, or you say that it is eternal and beginningless, necessarily existent in itself and independent of a maker.