Al-FawāʾidIbn al-Qayyim

If it is said, “He was destroyed only because he committed a forbidden act, namely shirk (associating partners with Allah),” the reply is: It is enough for destruction that he abandoned the very tawḥīd—affirming Allah’s oneness—that he was commanded to uphold, even if he never performed its positive opposite, shirk. Whenever a person’s heart is completely devoid of tawḥīd and he fails to single out Allah, he is ruined, even though he may not worship anything alongside Him. Should he then add to that the worship of another, he will be punished both for neglecting the commanded tawḥīd and for committing the prohibited shirk.

The eighth consideration makes this clear. Suppose someone invited to faith says, “I neither affirm nor deny, neither love nor hate; I will not worship Him, but I will not worship anything else either.” Such a person becomes an unbeliever solely by his omission and indifference. This differs from one who says, “I affirm the Messenger, love him, believe in him, and intend to do what he commands me; yet my desire, will, and natural inclination overpower me, preventing me from leaving what he has forbidden. I know he has prohibited it and dislikes my doing it, but I cannot restrain myself.” That person is not deemed an unbeliever on that account, nor is his ruling the same as the first. He is obedient in one respect, whereas the one who abandons every commanded duty is in no way obedient.

The ninth consideration clarifies the matter still further: obedience and disobedience relate primarily to the command and only secondarily to the prohibition. The obedient person is the one who fulfills what he has been commanded, while the disobedient person is the one who neglects the command. Allah, exalted is He, says, “They do not disobey Allah in what He commands them” (Al-Taḥrīm 66:6). And Moses said to his brother, “What prevented you, when you saw them going astray, from following me? Did you then disobey my command?” (Ṭā Hā 20:92–93).

ʿAmr ibn al-ʿĀṣ (d. 43 AH), when death approached him, declared: “I am the one whom You commanded, yet I disobeyed—but there is no deity but You.” (1)

(1) See Ibn Saʿd, al-Tabaqat, vol. 4, p. 260; Ahmad b. Hanbal, al-Musnad, vol. 4, pp. 199–200.
فإن قيل: فهو إنَّما هلك بارتكاب المحظور، وهو الشركُ. قيل: يكفي في الهلاك تركُ نفسِ التوحيد المأمور به وإن لم يأتِ بضدٍّ وجوديٍّ من الشرك، بل متى خلا قلبُهُ من التوحيد رأسًا؛ فلم يُوحِّد اللهَ فهو هالكٌ، وإن لم يَعبُد معه غيرَه، فإذا انضاف إليه عبادةُ غيره؛ عُذِّبَ على تركِ التوحيد المأمور به وفعلِ الشرك المنهيِّ عنه. يوضِّحه الوجه الثامن: أنَّ المدعوَّ إلى الإيمان إذا قال: لا أُصدِّقُ ولا أكذِّبُ ولا أُحِبُّ ولا أبغضُ ولا أعبده ولا أعبد غيره! كان كافرًا بمجرد الترك والإعراض؛ بخلاف ما إذا قال: أنا أصدِّقُ الرسولَ وأحبُّه وأؤمنُ به وأفعل ما أمرني، ولكنَّ شهوتي وإرادتي وطبعي حاكمةٌ عليَّ لا تَدَعُني أترُكُ ما نهاني عنه، وأنا أعلمُ أنه قد نهاني وكره لي فعل المنهي، ولكن لا صبر لي عنه! فهذا لا يُعَدُّ كافرًا بذلك، ولا حكمُهُ حكمُ الأوَّل؛ فإنَّ هذا مطيعٌ من وجهٍ، وتاركُ المأمور جملةً لا يُعَدُّ مطيعًا بوجهٍ. يوضِّحُه الوجهُ التاسعُ: أن الطاعة والمعصية إنما تتعلق بالأمر أصلًا وبالنهي تبعًا؛ فالمطيعُ ممتثلُ المأمور، والعاصي تاركُ المأمور: قال تعالى: ﴿لَا يَعْصُونَ اللَّهَ مَا أَمَرَهُمْ﴾ [التحريم: ٦]. وقال موسى لأخيه: ﴿مَا مَنَعَكَ إِذْ رَأَيتَهُمْ ضَلُّوا (٩٢) أَلَّا تَتَّبِعَنِ أَفَعَصَيتَ أَمْرِي (٩٣)﴾ [طه: ٩٢ - ٩٣]. وقال عمرو بن العاص عند موته: أنا الذي أمرْتَني فعصيتُ، ولكن لا إله إلا أنت (١).
(١) انظر طبقات ابن سعد (٤/ ٢٦٠) ومسند أحمد (٤/ ١٩٩ - ٢٠٠).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies