Among the kinds of exposition set forth in this blessed book—and it is among the most important—is the clarification that every attribute with which Allah has described Himself in this mighty Qur’an, such as istiwāʾ (being established above the Throne), hand, face, and all the other attributes, truly belongs to Him in reality, not metaphorically, while He, majestic and exalted, is utterly free of any likeness to the attributes of created beings. Exalted is He far above that. This comprehensive statement regarding all the attributes is contained in His words: “There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing” (11). By saying, “There is nothing like unto Him,” He negated any resemblance to created things, and by saying, “and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing” (11), He affirmed the attributes for Him in their true sense. You will, Allah willing, see this topic verified and elucidated with many Qur’anic verses in Sūrah al-Aʿrāf.
Another type of exposition included in this blessed book is that when we explain a Qur’anic passage by another Qur’anic passage on an issue over which others differ from us, and they claim that their opposing view is likewise supported by the Qur’an, we establish—through authentic Sunnah—the soundness of our explanation and the invalidity of theirs, so that our argument rests upon both Book and Sunnah. If our opponent also adduces Sunnah alongside the Qur’an he cites, we then demonstrate the superiority of what appears to us to be the stronger proof; and if our opponent cites only Qur’an, with no Sunnah text supporting either side, we show in what way our exposition outweighs his.
An example of the first of these three cases is our statement that the genitive reading of “wa arjulikum ilā al-kaʿbayn” (and your feet to the ankles) which implies wiping the feet in wuduʾ is clarified by the accusative reading “wa arjulakum,” which explicitly denotes washing; thus it establishes the obligation of washing the feet in ablution. From this it is understood that the genitive reading is due to its proximity to the preceding genitive phrase, or for some other interpretive consideration,