Aḍwāʾ al-BayānMuhammad al-Amin al-Shinqiti

His words here, “and upon their hearing,” are conjoined to “their hearts,” whereas His words, “and over their eyes is a covering,” form a new, independent clause made up of subject and predicate. Hence the sealing embraces the hearts and hearings, while the covering is confined to the eyes alone. The verse that makes this plain is His saying:
“Have you, then, seen the one who has taken his own desire as his god, whom Allah has led astray knowingly, setting a seal upon his hearing and his heart, and placing over his sight a covering?” (45:23)
You will find, in Sūrat al-Baqarah, the reply to the verse in al-Naḥl, God willing.

Another case of polysemy in a particle is the wāw in His words, “and those firmly grounded in knowledge” (3:7). That wāw may function as a conjunction, in which case those firmly grounded in knowledge would know the interpretation of the ambiguous passages; or it may be resumptive, in which case Allah alone possesses that knowledge. Several contextual clues favour the latter, as Ibn Qudāmah pointed out in Rawdat al-Nāẓir: “The verse contains indications that Allah, exalted is He, is unique in knowing the interpretation of the ambiguous, and that stopping at His words, ‘and none knows its interpretation except Allah,’ is correct both in recitation and in meaning. As for the wording, He censures those who pursue that interpretation; had it been known to those firmly grounded in knowledge, the seeker would have been praised, not blamed. Moreover, their declaration, ‘We believe,’ implies delegation and submission regarding something whose meaning they have not comprehended,” and so forth. You will encounter the remainder and its details, God willing, under Sūrat Āl ʿImrān.

A further example of a particle shared between two meanings is found in His words, “then wipe your faces and your hands with it” (4:43). The preposition min here may denote “partitive” or “the point of origin.” Al-Shāfiʿī and Aḥmad—may Allah have mercy on them—took it in this noble verse as partitive, stipulating a surface of earth whose dust clings to the hand. Mālik and Abū Ḥanīfah—may Allah have mercy on them—understood it as marking the starting point, and therefore did not stipulate that condition.

قوله هنا: "وعلى سمعهم" معطوف على قلوبهم، وأن قوله: "وعلى أبصارهم غشاوة" جملة مستأنفة مبتدأ وخبر، فيكون الختم على القلوب والأسماع والغشاوة على خصوص الأبصار، والآية التي بين بها ذلك هي قوله تعالى: ﴿أَفَرَأَيتَ مَنِ اتَّخَذَ إِلَهَهُ هَوَاهُ وَأَضَلَّهُ اللَّهُ عَلَى عِلْمٍ وَخَتَمَ عَلَى سَمْعِهِ وَقَلْبِهِ وَجَعَلَ عَلَى بَصَرِهِ غِشَاوَةً﴾ وسترى في سورة البقرة الجواب عن آية النحل إن شاء الله تعالى. ومن أمثلة الاشتراك في حرف أيضًا الاشتراك في الواو من قوله: ﴿وَالرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ﴾ فإنها محتملة للعطف فيكون الراسخون في العلم يعلمون تأويل المتشابه ومحتملة للاستئناف، فيكون الله تعالى مستأثرًا بعلمه دون خلقه وفي الآية قرائن ترجح أنها للاستئناف أوضحها ابن قدامة في روضة الناظر قال: وفي الآية قرائن تدل على أن الله ﷾ منفرد بعلم تأويل المتشابه وأن الوقف صحيح عند قوله تعالى: ﴿وَمَا يَعْلَمُ تَأْويلَهُ إلا اللَّهُ﴾ لفظًا ومعنى، أما اللفظ فلأنه ذم مبتغى التأويل، ولو كان ذلك للراسخين معلومًا لكان مبتغيه ممدوحًا لا مذمومًا، ولأن قولهم: "آمنا" يدل على نوع تفويض وتسليم لشيء لم يقفوا على معناه إلى آخره. وسترى تمامه وتفصيله إن شاء الله في سورة آل عمران. ومن أمثلة الاشتراك في حرف قوله تعالى: ﴿فَامْسَحُوا بِوُجُوهِكُمْ وَأَيدِيكُمْ مِنْهُ﴾ فإن لفظة "من" مشتركة بين التبعيض وابتداء الغاية، وقد قال الشافعي وأحمد -رحمهما الله- هي في هذه الآية الكريمة للتبعيض، فاشترطا صعيدًا له غبار يعلق باليد، وقال مالك وأبو حنيفة -رحمهما الله- هي لابتداء الغاية فلم يشترطا

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies