Zād al-MaʿādIbn al-Qayyim

Saturday, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday—five days in all. According to his view, the departure would have taken place with seven days remaining; if the day of departure were excluded, six would remain. Either reckoning contradicts the hadith.

If the nights are counted, his departure would have been with six nights remaining, not five. Thus, a Thursday departure cannot possibly be reconciled with five days remaining in the month. By contrast, if the departure was on Saturday, then (1) five days undoubtedly remained, counting the day of departure. This is further supported by the fact that the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, addressed them from his pulpit in Medina about ihrām and what a person in ihrām should wear. Apparently, this was on Friday, since there is no report that he assembled them or summoned them to attend the sermon. Ibn ‘Umar witnessed this sermon from his pulpit in Medina. It was the Prophet’s practice, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, to teach them whatever they needed when the time came to put it into practice. The most fitting occasion was therefore the Friday closest to his departure. It also seems unlikely that he would have missed the Friday prayer without necessity when only part of a day remained before it: the people had gathered around him, he was more eager than anyone to teach them their religion, and he was present at that great gathering. Attending both it and Hajj (2) was possible without missing either. Allah knows best.

When Abū Muhammad Ibn Hazm realized that the statement of Ibn ‘Abbās and ‘Ā’ishah, “He departed with five days remaining in Dhū al-Qa‘dah,” could not be reconciled with (3) his own view, he interpreted it by saying: It means that (4) he set out from Dhū al-Hulayfah with five days remaining = He said: There are only four miles between Dhū al-Hulayfah and Medina

(1) ع, ج, ك: “kāna” (“was”). Corrected in the margin of ع. (2) ج: “al-jum‘ah” (“Friday”), erroneously. (3) ق, ع, ب, مب: “‘alā” (“on”). (4) “An” (“that”) is absent from ك.
السَّبت والأحد والاثنين والثُّلاثاء والأربعاء، فهذه خمسٌ، وعلى قوله يكون خروجه لسبعٍ بقين، فإن لم يعدَّ يوم الخروج كان لستٍّ، وأيُّهما كان فهو خلاف الحديث. وإن اعتبر اللَّيالي كان خروجه لستِّ ليالٍ بقين لا لخمسٍ، فلا يصحُّ الجمع بين خروجه يومَ الخميس وبين بقاء خمسٍ من الشَّهر البتَّةَ، بخلاف ما إذا كان الخروج يوم السَّبت، فإنَّ (١) الباقي بيوم الخروج خمسٌ بلا شكٍّ. ويدلُّ عليه أنَّ النَّبيَّ ﷺ ذكر لهم في خطبته شأنَ الإحرام وما يلبس المحرم بالمدينة على منبره، والظَّاهر أنَّ هذا كان يوم الجمعة، لأنَّه لم يُنقل أنَّه جمعهم ونادى فيهم لحضور الخطبة، وقد شهد ابن عمر هذه الخطبة بالمدينة على منبره. وكان عادته ﷺ أن يعلِّمهم في كلِّ وقتٍ ما يحتاجون إليه إذا حضر فعلُه، فأولى الأوقات به الجمعة الَّتي تلي خروجه، والظَّاهر أنَّه لم يكن ليدع الجمعة وبينه وبينها بعضُ يومٍ من غير ضرورةٍ، وقد اجتمع إليه الخلق، وهو أحرص النَّاس على تعليمهم الدِّين، وقد حضر ذلك المجمع العظيم. والجمع بينه وبين الحجِّ (٢) ممكنٌ بلا تفويتٍ. والله أعلم. ولمَّا علم أبو محمد ابن حزم أنَّ قول ابن عبَّاسٍ وعائشة: «خرج لخمسٍ بقين من ذي القعدة» لا يلتئم مع (٣) قوله أوَّلَه بأن قال: معناه أنَّ (٤) اندفاعه من ذي الحليفة كان لخمسٍ= قال: وليس بين ذي الحليفة وبين المدينة إلا أربعة أميالٍ
(١) ع، ج، ك: «كان». وصحح في هامش ع. (٢) ج: «الجمعة»، خطأ. (٣) ق، ع، ب، مب: «على». (٤) «أن» ليست في ك.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies