the wisdom behind the prohibition of continuous fasting and the harm it entailed for them, but not for him (peace and blessings be upon him).
They argued: His allowing them to fast continuously for this overriding benefit was no more serious than allowing (1) the Bedouin to urinate in his mosque (2), for the benefit of winning his heart and so as not to alienate him from Islam. Nor was it more serious than his allowing the man who prayed incorrectly to perform a prayer which he (peace and blessings be upon him) declared was no prayer at all (3), and whose performer was not truly praying. Indeed, it was an invalid prayer according to his religion. He nevertheless allowed him to continue so that he could teach him after he had finished and the man would accept his instruction, for this is more effective for teaching and learning.
They argued: He (peace and blessings be upon him) said: “When I command you to do something, do as much of it as you can; and when I forbid you to do something, avoid it” (4).
They argued: In the hadith, he mentioned something indicating that continuous fasting was exclusive to him, saying: “I am not like you.” Had it been permissible, it would not have been exclusive to him.
They argued: In the two Sahīh collections (5), ‘Umar ibn al-Khattāb narrated that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: “When night approaches from here, day retreats from here (6), and the sun sets, the fasting person has broken his fast.” The two Sahīh collections also contain a similar report (7) in a hadith narrated by