of ‘Ā’ishah stating that the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, would sometimes shorten the prayers while travelling and sometimes offer them in full, and would sometimes refrain from fasting and sometimes fast (1), it is not authentic. I heard Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah say (2): “It is a lie attributed to the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him.” End of quotation.
Another version reads: “He would shorten the prayers, while she would offer them in full.” The first verb begins with yā’, the last letter of the alphabet, and the second with tā’, which has two dots above. Likewise, it reads: “He would refrain from fasting, while she would fast.” This means that she followed the ruling without taking the concession (3) in both cases. Our shaykh said (4): This (5) is false. The Mother of the Believers would never have opposed the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, and all his Companions by praying differently from them. How could she, when it is authentically reported from her that Allah prescribed the prayers as two units, then, when the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, emigrated to Medina, the prayers offered when not travelling were increased, while the prayers offered during travel were left unchanged (6)? Given this, how could anyone suppose that she prayed differently from the Prophet (7), peace and blessings be upon him, and the Muslims accompanying him?
I say: ‘Ā’ishah did offer the prayers in full after the Prophet’s death, peace and blessings be upon him. Ibn ‘Abbās, or someone else, said: “She adopted an interpretation just as ‘Uthmān did (8), whereas the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, always shortened the prayers.” Some narrators combined the two reports into one, saying: “The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, would shorten the prayers, while she would offer them in full,” and an error was made