Zād al-MaʿādIbn al-Qayyim

hadith masters circulated both collections and took care to ensure the accuracy and correctness of their texts. He said: This is why errors and textual corruptions occur in it (1).

I say (2): This is supported by the fact that those who carefully recorded the sunnah prayers before and after the obligatory prayers and wrote on the subject—including compilers of collections of Sunnah reports, legal hadiths, and other works—did not cite this hadith concerning a sunnah prayer before Friday prayer. Rather, they cited it to establish the recommendation to perform the prayer of greeting the mosque while the imam is on the pulpit, and used it as evidence against those who prohibited performing it (3) in these circumstances. Had these two units constituted the sunnah prayer associated with Friday prayer, citing them under that heading, devoting a chapter to them, preserving their report, and making them widely known would have deserved greater priority than treating them as the prayer of greeting the mosque.

This is also supported by the fact that the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, instructed only the person entering to pray these two units, because they were the prayer of greeting the mosque. Had they been a sunnah prayer associated with Friday prayer, he would also have instructed those already seated to perform them, rather than singling out the person entering (4).

Some cited as evidence what Abū Dāwūd narrated in his Sunan (5): Musaddad narrated to us, saying: We were told by

(1) Burhān al-Dīn, the author’s son, also quoted this from his teacher al-Mizzī in his treatise Tahqīq al-qawl fī sunnat al-jumu‘a (A Critical Examination of the Sunnah Prayer Associated with Friday Prayer), p. 64. (2) K reads: “qāla (he said),” a scribal error. It was corrected in ‘A. (3) Mb and N read: “min fi‘lihā (from performing it).” (4) All manuscripts except Q, M, Mb, and N read: “li-l-dākhil (for the person entering),” which may be a textual corruption. (5) No. 1128. Ibn Hibbān (2476) and al-Bayhaqī (6154) also transmitted it through Musaddad. Ibn Abī Shayba (5403), al-Nasā’ī in al-Mujtabā (1429) and al-Kubrā (1759), and Ibn Khuzayma (1836) also transmitted it through various chains from Nāfi‘ with the same report. The hadith is authentic; see Sahīh Abī Dāwūd—al-Umm, 4:290–291.
الحفاظ تداولوهما واعتنوا بضبطهما وتصحيحهما. قال: ولذلك يقع فيه أغلاط وتصحيف (١). قلت (٢): ويدل على صحة هذا أنَّ الذين اعتنوا بضبط سنن الصلاة قبلها وبعدها وصنَّفوا في ذلك من أهل السنن والأحكام وغيرها، لم يذكر أحد منهم هذا الحديث في سنة الجمعة قبلها، وإنما ذكروه في استحباب فعل تحيَّة المسجد والإمامُ على المنبر، واحتجُّوا به على مَن منع فعلَها (٣) في هذه الحال. فلو كانت هذه هي سنَّة الجمعة لكان ذكرُها هناك والترجمة عليها وحفظها وشهرتها أولى من تحية المسجد. ويدل عليه أيضًا أنَّ النَّبيَّ ﷺ لم يأمر بهاتين الركعتين إلا الداخلَ لأجل أنهما تحية المسجد. ولو كانت سنَّةً للجمعة لأمرَ بها القاعدين أيضًا ولم يخُصَّ بالأمر بها الداخلَ (٤) وحده. ومنهم من احتجَّ بما رواه أبو داود في «سننه» (٥): حدثنا مسدَّد، ثنا
(١) نقله برهان الدين ابن المصنف أيضًا عن شيخه المزِّي في رسالته «تحقيق القول في سنة الجمعة» (ص ٦٤). (٢) في ك: «قال»، وهو سهو من الناسخ. وقد أصلح في ع. (٣) مب، ن: «مِن فعلها». (٤) ما عدا ق، م، مب، ن: «للداخل»، ولعله تصحيف. (٥) برقم (١١٢٨)، ومن طريق مسدد أخرجه أيضًا ابن حبان (٢٤٧٦) والبيهقي (٦١٥٤). وأخرجه أيضًا ابن أبي شيبة (٥٤٠٣) والنسائي في «المجبتى» (١٤٢٩) و «الكبرى» (١٧٥٩) وابن خزيمة (١٨٣٦) من طرق عن نافع به. والحديث صحيح، انظر: «صحيح أبي داود- الأم» (٤/ ٢٩٠، ٢٩١).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies