(1) Al-Tirmidhī reported it from ‘Abd Allāh ibn Mas‘ūd (295) and graded it authentic. Under this topic, he mentioned reports from eight Companions, including Jābir ibn ‘Abd Allāh, whom the author did not mention, bringing their total to sixteen. See al-Wā’ilī, Nuzhat al-Albāb (2:647–650). Those whom al-Tirmidhī did not mention are Sahl ibn Sa‘d [Ahmad (22864)], Abū Mūsā al-Ash‘arī [Ibn Mājah (917)], Hudhayfah ibn al-Yamān [Ibn Mājah (916)], Abū Mālik al-Ash‘arī [Ma‘ānī al-Āthār (1:269)], Talq ibn ‘Alī [Ahmad (39:464)], Aws ibn Aws [Ma‘ānī al-Āthār (1:269) and Mu‘jam al-Tabarānī (1:219)], and Abū Rimthah [Ma‘ānī al-Āthār (1:269) and Mu‘jam al-Tabarānī (727, 728)]. Ibn al-Mulaqqin additionally mentioned reports from Wāthilah ibn al-Asqa‘ and Ya‘qūb ibn Husayn; see al-Badr al-Munīr (4:61–62). (2) Reported by al-Tirmidhī (296), Ibn Mājah (919), and Ibn Hibbān (1995) from ‘Ā’ishah. Its chain includes Zuhayr ibn Muhammad. Reports transmitted from him by Syrian narrators are munkar (unacceptable), as al-Tirmidhī related from al-Bukhārī, and this is one such Syrian transmission. Abū Hātim said in al-‘Ilal (414): “This is a munkar hadith; it is a mawqūf report from ‘Ā’ishah”—that is, attributed to her rather than to the Prophet. Al-Dāraqutnī likewise preferred the mawqūf version in his al-‘Ilal (3513). It has a corroborating report from Sahl ibn Sa‘d, but one that inspires no confidence, reported by Ibn Mājah (918), al-Tabarānī (6:122), and al-Dāraqutnī (1354, 1355). Its chain includes ‘Abd al-Muhaymin ibn ‘Abbās ibn Sahl ibn Sa‘d, of whom al-Bukhārī said in al-Tārīkh al-Kabīr (6:137): “Munkar al-hadīth (a transmitter of unacceptable hadiths).” There is another corroborating report from Salamah ibn al-Akwa‘, which is likewise weak, reported by Ibn Mājah (920) and al-Bayhaqī (2:179). Its chain includes Yahyā ibn Rāshid, who is weak.