Zād al-MaʿādIbn al-Qayyim

And the evidence for this is their use of the preposition lām: they say, mā adraba Zaydan li-'Amrin (“How much Zayd strikes 'Amr!”). Had the verb retained its original transitivity, they would have said, mā adraba Zaydan 'Amran, since it would govern one object directly and the other through the transitivizing hamza. Thus, when they made it govern one object through the transitivizing hamza, they made it govern the other through lām. This is what led them to say that the comparative and superlative form and the exclamatory verb can be formed only from an action performed by the subject, not from an action undergone by the object.

Others disputed this, saying that both forms may be derived from an action performed by the subject or from an action undergone by the object, and that the abundance of attested usage is among the clearest proofs that this is permissible. The Arabs say, mā ashghalahu bi-l-shay' (“How occupied he is with something!”). This derives from shughila (“he was occupied”), hence mashghūl (“occupied”). Likewise, they say, mā awla'ahu bi-kadhā (“How infatuated he is with such-and-such!”). This derives from ūli'a bi-l-shay' (“he was infatuated with something”), hence mūla' (“infatuated”): it is exclusively passive. Similarly, their expression mā a'jabahu bi-kadhā (“How impressed he is by such-and-such!”) derives from u'jiba bihi (“he was impressed by it”). They also say, mā ahabbahu ilayya (“How beloved he is to me!”), expressing wonder at an action undergone by the object—his being beloved to you. The same applies to mā abghadahu ilayya (“How hateful he is to me!”) and amqatahu ilayya (“How loathsome he is to me!”).

Here there is a well-known grammatical question discussed by Sībawayh (1). You say, mā abghadanī lahu (“How much I hate him!”), mā ahabbanī lahu (“How much I love him!”), and mā amqatanī lahu (“How much I loathe him!”), when you are the one who hates and dislikes, loves, or loathes (2). You are thus expressing wonder at an action performed by the subject. But you say, mā abghadanī ilayhi (“How hateful I am to him!”), mā amqatanī ilayhi (“How loathsome I am to him!”), and mā ahabbanī ilayhi (“How beloved I am to him!”), when you are the one hated, loathed, or loved. The exclamation then concerns an action undergone by the object. Thus, the construction with lām concerns the subject, whereas the construction with ilā concerns the object.

(1) In al-Kitāb (The Book), 4:99–100. (2) ك, ع: “wa-l-muhibb al-māqit” (“and the one who loves and loathes”).
والدليل على ذلك مجيئهم باللام، فيقولون: ما أضرب زيدًا لعمرو. ولو كان باقيًا على تعدِّيه لقيل: ما أضرب زيدًا عمرًا، لأنه متعدٍّ إلى واحد بنفسه، وإلى الآخر بهمزة التعدية؛ فلما أن عدَّوه إلى المفعول بهمزة التعدية عدَّوه إلى الآخر باللام. فهذا هو الذي أوجب لهم أن قالوا: إنهما لا يصاغان إلا من فعل الفاعل، لا من الواقع على المفعول. ونازعهم في ذلك آخرون، وقالوا: يجوز صوغهما من فعل الفاعل، ومن الواقع على المفعول وكثرةُ السماع به من أبين الأدلة على جوازه. تقول العرب: ما أشغله بالشيء، وهذا من شُغِل فهو مشغول. وكذلك يقولون: ما أولعه بكذا، وهذا من أُولِعَ بالشيء فهو مُولَعٌ، مبنيٌّ للمفعول ليس إلا. وكذلك قولهم: ما أعجبه بكذا، هو من أُعجِبَ به. ويقولون: ما أحبَّه إليَّ، هو تعجُّب من فعل المفعول، وكونه محبوبًا لك. وكذا: ما أبغَضَه إليَّ، وأمقَتَه إليَّ. وهنا مسألة مشهورة ذكرها سيبويه (١)، وهي أنك تقول: ما أبغضني له، وما أحبَّني له، وما أمقتني له: إذا كنت أنت المبغِض الكاره، والمحِبَّ والماقت (٢)، فتكون متعجِّبًا من فعل الفاعل. وتقول: ما أبغضني إليه، وما أمقتني إليه، وما أحبَّني إليه: إذا كنت أنت البغيض الممقوت أو المحبوب، فيكون تعجُّبًا من الفعل الواقع على المفعول. فما كان باللام فهو للفاعل، وما كان بـ «إلى» فهو للمفعول.
(١) في «الكتاب» (٤/ ٩٩ - ١٠٠). (٢) ك، ع: «والمحب الماقت».

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies