Al-Ṣawāʿiq al-MurṣalaIbn al-Qayyim

—a deep ocean, overcast by a wave, upon which is another wave, above which are clouds: layers of darkness, one atop another. If he stretches out his hand, he can hardly see it. For anyone to whom Allah has not granted light, he shall have no light at all (24:40). Allah knows that we do not say this in blind imitation of anyone else (1); rather, we are only reporting what we have personally observed and witnessed.

If you would like to ascertain the matter for yourself, examine most of their propositions and the proofs they advance for them. After grueling toil and exhausting effort, you will find that these quests yield no sound conclusion. Even after all their labor they fail to affirm for the universe a Lord who is distinct from and separate from it. Instead, having strained themselves to establish a being who is neither inside the world nor outside it, neither connected to it nor detached from it, they remain in doubt about His very existence: is He identical to His essence, or is He something over and above it? Some say He is additional, some say He is not, and others suspend judgment altogether—still uncertain whether He exists and, if so, whether He is identical to His essence or additional to it.

They are equally uncertain about His attributes: are they positive realities, mere negations, or neither existent nor non-existent? Are they something added to the One described, or not? How, then, can they affirm them in a manner that does not entail multiplicity within the Essence or differentiation from it? Some of them regard the attributes as sheer negations, others as purely relative states (3), while still others refrain from taking any position. Among them are those who hold that His knowledge is identical with His very Essence—thus turning the Essence into “knowledge.” Others maintain that His knowledge is identical with the object known. Yet others insist that His knowledge is one, neither multiple (4) nor divisible, thereby making His knowledge of the existence—

لُّجِّيٍّ يَغْشَاهُ مَوْجٌ مِّن فَوْقِهِ مَوْجٌ مِّن فَوْقِهِ سَحَابٌ ظُلُمَاتٌ بَعْضُهَا فَوْقَ بَعْضٍ إِذَا أَخْرَجَ يَدَهُ لَمْ يَكَدْ يَرَاهَا وَمَن لَّمْ يَجْعَلِ اِللَّهُ لَهُ نُورًا فَمَا لَهُ مِن نُّورٍ﴾ [النور: ٣٨ - ٣٩]. والله يعلم أنَّا لم نَقُلْ ذلك تقليدًا لغيرنا (١)، بل إخبارًا عمَّا شاهدناه ورأيناه. وإذا أحببتَ أن تعلم ذلك حقيقةً فتأمَّل عامة مطالبهم وأدلتهم عليها، كيف تجدها مطالب ـ بعد التعب الشديد والجهد الجَهِيد ـ لا يحصل منها على مطلبٍ صحيحٍ، فإنهم بعد الكدِّ والجهد لم يثبتوا للعالَم ربًّا مباينًا عنه منفصلًا منه، بل بعد الجهد الشديد في إثبات موجودٍ لا داخل العالم ولا خارجه ولا متصلًا به ولا منفصلًا عنه، هم شاكُّون في وجوده: هل هو نفس ماهيته أو زائد عليها؟ فمِن ذاهبٍ إلى أنه زائدٌ، ومن ذاهبٍ إلى أنه ليس بزائدٍ، ومن متوقفٍ في وجوده شاكٍّ فيه، هل هو نفس ماهيته أو زائد عليها؟ ثم هم شاكُّون في أن صفاته هل (٢) هي وجودية أو عدمية، أو لا وجودية ولا عدمية؟ وهل هي زائدة على الموصوف أو ليست زائدة؟ فكيف تثبت له على وجهٍ لا يُوجِب تكثُّرًا في الذات ولا مغايرة بينها، فبعضهم يجعلها أمورًا عدمية، وبعضهم أحوالًا نسبية (٣)، وبعضهم يتوقف فيها. ومنهم مَن يجعل علمه نفس ذاته، فيجعل ذاته علمًا، ومنهم مَن يجعل علمه نفس معلومه، ومنهم من يجعل علمه واحدًا لا يتعدد (٤) ولا ينقسم، فيجعل علمه بوجود
(١) «ب»: «كغيرنا». (٢) «هل» ليس في «ب». (٣) «ح»: «سنية». (٤) «ح»: «يتعدى».

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies