Ashrat al-Saah - al-WabilYusuf al-Wabil

because the conjecture meant here is not the preponderant probability they had in mind. Rather, it means doubt, falsehood, baseless speculation, and guesswork. Al-Nihāya, Lisān al-Arab, and other lexicons state: “Conjecture is a doubt that arises in your mind about something, which you then treat as certain and judge accordingly” (1).

Ibn Kathīr said in his commentary on this verse: “‘They have no knowledge of this (28)’ [al-Najm: 28]—that is, they possess no sound knowledge confirming what they say. Rather, it is a lie, a falsehood, a fabrication, and heinous disbelief. ‘They follow nothing but conjecture, and conjecture is of no avail against the truth (28)’ [al-Najm: 28]—that is, it is of no benefit whatsoever and can never take the place of truth. It is authentically established that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: ‘Beware of suspicion, for suspicion is the falsest of speech’ (2).” (3)

Thus, the conjecture that Allah Most High condemned and censured the polytheists for was doubt and falsehood. This is further supported by His saying: “They follow nothing but conjecture, and they do nothing but guess (116)” [al-An‘ām: 116]. He thus described them as following conjecture and engaging in mere speculation and guesswork. If the conjecture in question is mere speculation and guesswork, it may not be relied upon in legal rulings (4), for rulings are not founded on doubt and guesswork.

As for the claim that a narrator may have been inattentive or forgotten, this is rebutted by the conditions required for an individual report: every narrator must be trustworthy and precise. Thus, once the hadith is established as authentic,

(1) See *al-Nihāya fī Gharīb al-Hadīth wa-l-Athar* (The Definitive Work on Unfamiliar Terms in Hadith and Reports), 3:162–163. (2) *Sahīh Muslim*, “The Book of Virtue, Maintaining Ties, and Etiquette,” chapter “The Prohibition of Suspicion and Spying,” 16:118, with al-Nawawī’s commentary. (3) *Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr*, 7:434. (4) See Umar Sulaymān al-Ashqar, *al-Aqīda fī Allāh* (Creed Concerning Allah), pp. 48–49; Dār al-Nafāis, Beirut; published by Maktabat al-Falāh, Kuwait, 2nd ed., 1979.
لأنّ الظنَّ هنا ليس هو الظن الغالب الّذي عنوه، وإنّما هو الشك والكذب والخرص والتخمين؛ فقد جاء في "النهاية" و"اللسان" وغيرهما من كتب اللُّغة: "الظنُّ: الشكُّ يعرض لك في شيء، فتحقَّقهُ، وتحكم به" (١). قال ابن كثير في تفسير هذه الآية: ﴿وَمَا لَهُمْ بِهِ مِنْ عِلْمٍ (٢٨)﴾ [النجم: ٢٨]؛ أي: ليس لهم علمٌ صحيح يصدِّق ما قالوه، بل هو كذبٌ وزورٌ وافتراءٌ وكفرٌ شنيعٌ، ﴿لْمٍ إِنْ يَتَّبِعُونَ إِلَّا الظَّنَّ وَإِنَّ الظَّنَّ لَا يُغْنِي مِنَ الْحَقِّ شَيْئًا (٢٨)﴾ [النجم:٢٨]؛ أي: لا يُجدي شيئًا، وَلا يقوم أبدًا مقام الحق. وقد ثبت في الصّحيح أن رسول الله ﷺ قال: (إياكم والظن؛ فإن الظن أكذب الحديث) (٢) " (٣). فالشك والكذب هو الظنُّ الّذي ذمَّه الله تعالى، ونعاه على المشركين، ويؤيَّد ذلك قوله تعالى: ﴿إِنْ يَتَّبِعُونَ إِلَّا الظَّنَّ وَإِنْ هُمْ إِلَّا يَخْرُصُونَ (١١٦)﴾ [الأنعام: ١١٦]، فوصفهم بالظنَ والخرص الّذي هو مجرَّد الحزر والتَّخمين، وإذا كان الخرص والتَّخمين هو الظن؛ فإنّه لا يجوز الأخذ به في الأحكام (٤)؛ لأنّ الأحكام لا تُبنى على الشك والتخمين. وأمّا ما قيل من احتمال غفلة الراوي ونسيانه؛ فهو مدفوعٌ بما يُشترط في خبر الواحد؛ من كون كلّ من الرواة ثقةً ضابطًا، فمع صحة الحديث
(١) انظر: "النهاية في غريب الحديث والأثر" (٣/ ١٦٢ - ١٦٣). (٢) "صحيح مسلم"، كتاب البرّ والصلة والآداب، باب تحريم الظن والتجسس، (١٦/ ١١٨ - مع شرح النووي). (٣) "تفسير ابن كثير" (٧/ ٤٣٤). (٤) أنظر: "العقيدة في الله" (ص ٤٨ - ٤٩) لعمر سليمان الأشقر، طبع دار النفائس بيروت، نشر مكتبة الفلاح الكويت، الطبعة الثّانية، ١٩٧٩ م.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies