Al-FurūsiyyaIbn al-Qayyim

to the opinions of people (1); whatever accords with the truth we accept, and whatever contravenes it we reject. Rather, we are among those who submit the views and statements of men to the proof itself: whatever agrees with the proof we count as reliable and embrace, and whatever disagrees with it we oppose.

They said: “We will show that the armies of evidence on which you have relied, and from which you have sought victory, cannot so much as lift a hand against our forces, nor can they keep pace with our horsemen in the field. Your narrations are spurious and defective; none of the sound reports is on your side, and your analogy is manifestly void from more than forty angles (2). Thus we say—and in Allah the Exalted lies all success:

“As for your opening citation of His words, ‘It is not for a believing man or a believing woman, once Allah and His Messenger have decided a matter, to have any choice about their affair’ (Al-Ahzab 33:36), and His words, ‘Whatever the Messenger gives you, take it’ (Al-Hashr 59:7), and the remainder of your prologue—yes, by Allah! We hear and obey the summons of Allah and His Messenger, and we abandon every statement that conflicts with it (3).

“We appeal to you by Allah: when we call you to the texts that contradict the one you have imitated, will you place those texts ahead of his word and act according to them? Or will you treat the statement of the one you follow (4) as a decisive text that rules over them (5), while reducing the revealed passages to mere ambiguous appearances—so that, if they can be deflected by assorted interpretations, you do so, and if not you simply say, ‘The imam of the school knows better’?”

(1) The Z manuscript reads al-rijal (“the men/transmitters”). (2) As noted above (pp. 88–147). (3) Z has khalafahu (“contradicted him”), whereas H reads al-mukhalafah (“the contradiction”). (4) In H the section from the word hal (“is it…?”) up to qalladtumuhu (“you have imitated him”) is missing. (5) H and the printed edition (Maṭ) read muhkaman (“definitive”) instead of hakiman ʿalayha (“authoritative over it”).
على آراء الخلق (١)، فما وافقه منها قبله، وما خالفه ردَّه، وإنما نحن ممَّن يعرض آراء الرجال وأقوالها على الدليل، فما وافقه منها اعتدَّ به وقبله، وما خالفه خالفه. قالوا: ونحن نبيِّنُ أنَّ جيوش أدلتكم التي عوَّلتم عليها واستندتم في النصرة إليها ليست لها في مقاومة جيوشنا يَدَان، ولا تجري مع فرسانها في ميدان، وأَنها أحاديث باطلة معلولة، وصحيحها ليس معكم منه شيء، وأَن قياسكم بيِّنُ البطلان من أكثر من أربعين وجهًا (٢)، فنقول وبالله تعالى التوفيق: أما ما قدَّمتم من ذكر قوله تعالى: ﴿وَمَا كَانَ لِمُؤْمِنٍ وَلَا مُؤْمِنَةٍ إِذَا قَضَى اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ أَمْرًا أَنْ يَكُونَ لَهُمُ الْخِيَرَةُ مِنْ أَمْرِهِمْ﴾ [الأحزاب: ٣٦]، وقوله: ﴿وَمَا آتَاكُمُ الرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ﴾ [الحشر: ٧] إلى آخر المقدمة؛ فنعم والله؛ سمعًا وطاعة لداعي الله ورسوله ﷺ، وتركًا لكل قول يخالفه (٣). ونحن ننشدكم الله إذا دعوناكم إلى النصوص التي تخالف مَن قلَّدتموه، هل تقدمونها على قوله وتقولون بموجبها؟ أم تجعلون قول من قلَّدتموه (٤) نصًّا حاكمًا عليها (٥)، والنصوص ظواهر متشابهة إن أمكن ردَّها بأنواع التأويلات، وإلا قيل: صاحب المذهب أعلم؟
(١) في (ظ) (الرجال). (٢) كما تقدم (ص / ٨٨ - ١٤٧). (٣) في (ظ) (خالفه)، وفي (ح) (المخالفه). (٤) من قوله (هل) إلى (قلدتموه) سقط من (ح). (٥) في (ح، مط) (مُحْكما) بدل (حاكمًا عليها).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies