Al-FurūsiyyaIbn al-Qayyim

Abū al-Maʿālī al-Juwaynī related this view on the authority of al-Shāfiʿī, and Abū Muḥammad al-Mundhirī adopted it in his commentary on Sunan Abī Dāwūd,(1) saying, “The ḥadīth supports it.”
Then they said: On this basis, if the muhallil and one of the two stake-givers cross the finish line together,
– should we hold that he makes it lawful for himself alone, the muhallil would appropriate(2) the whole purse to the exclusion of the other, even though they tied;
– but if we hold that he makes it lawful for himself and for them both, the two of them would share the prize equally,(3) even if one of the two contributors had outrun the other.
According to the majority, the muhallil is entitled to the entire purse, whereas, in Ibn Khayrān’s view, he and the muhallil divide the third man’s stake between them.(4)
Such is the wording of some Shāfiʿīs,(5) while al-Nihāyah records that,(6) if he should come in first

and he was taken to task on this, saying: “This is a mistake ….” Consult the cited discussion. (1) See his Mukhtasar Sunan Abi Dawud 2/413, where he comments: “and the hadith is proof against him.” (2) The Mat manuscript reads: yastafid (“benefits”). (3) The words from wa in qulna (“and if we say”) up to sawaʾ (“equally”) are absent from H. (4) In H and Mat the word appears as al-sabaq; the scribe of H noted: “Perhaps it should be: sabaqa.” (5) Mat reads: “some of al-Shafiʿi’s companions.” The forthcoming book al-Nihaya is Imam al-Haramayn’s Nihayat al-Matlab fi Dirayat al-Madhhab (d. 478 AH), a commentary on all of al-Shafiʿi’s works and the abridgements of al-Muzani, al-Buwayti, and others. ʿAbd al-Ghafir said: “No work like it has ever been produced in the school, of that I am certain” (Tabaqat al-Shafiʿiyya 5/171). (6) From Z.
وحكاه أبو المعالي الجُوَيْني قولًا للشافعي، واختاره أبو محمد المنذري في كتابه على "سنن أبي داود" (١)، وقال: "عليه يدل الحديث". ثم قالوا: فعلى هذا، لو سبق المحلِّل وأحدُهما بحيث جاءا معًا: فإن قلنا: يحلُّه لنفسه فقط؛ استبدَّ (٢) المحلِّل بالسَّبَق جميعِه دون الآخر، مع تساويهما في السبق. وإن قلنا: يحله لنفسه ولهما؛ فإنهما يكونان في السَّبَق سواء (٣)، ولو سبق أحد الباذلين الآخر. والمحلِّل على قول الجمهور يستحقُّ السَّبَق جميعه، وعلى قول ابن خيران يشترك هو والمحلِّل في سبق (٤) الثالث. هكذا قال بعض الشافعية (٥)، والذي في "النهاية": إنه (٦) إن سبق
= وتعقبه في ذلك فقال: (وهذا خطأ … ) فراجعه. (١) انظر مختصر سنن أبي داود له (٢/ ٤١٣) وفيه (والحديث حجة عليه). (٢) في (مط) (يستفيد). (٣) من قوله (وإن قلنا) إلى (سواء) ليس في (ح). (٤) في (ح)، (مط) (السبق)، قال (ناسخ (ح): "لعله: سبق". (٥) في (مط) (بعض أصحاب الشافعي)، وكتاب "النهاية" الآتي هو "نهاية المطلب في دراية المذهب" لإمام الحرمين (ت: ٤٧٨ هـ)، شرح فيه جميع كتب الشافعي، ومختصري المزني البويطي وغيرهما. قال عبد الغافر: "لم يُصنَّف في المذهب مثلها، فيما أجزم به" طبقات الشافعية (٥/ ١٧١). (٦) من (ظ).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies