Al-TisʿīniyyaIbn Taimiya

Mass-transmitted hadiths from the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—state unequivocally that Allah singled out Moses for direct speech, a distinction not granted to Abraham, Jesus, and others like them (1). Yet, according to your teaching, there is no such difference; indeed, some of your own leading figures have claimed that an ordinary person who is not a prophet can hear Allah’s speech just as Moses son of ‘Imran heard it. Thus anyone who experiences an inner inspiration, in your estimation, has been addressed by Allah in the very manner that He addressed Moses. It is well known, however, that even the Mu‘tazilah never descended to such an extreme in their deviation.

In fact, one who says that Allah honored Moses by creating speech in the surrounding air for him to hear is guilty of a lesser innovation than someone who alleges that Allah did nothing more than cause Moses to grasp a meaning He intended. Your view, rather, comes close to that of the philosophers who maintain that Allah has no speech except what exists within souls, and that He spoke to Moses from the “heaven” of Moses’ own intellect—though you part company with them by affirming an eternal meaning that subsists in Allah’s Essence.

Moreover, you have treated the Quran’s presence in the written codices as though Allah Himself were present in them, saying that His words, “Indeed, it is a noble Quran (77) in a well-guarded Book” (2) are on the same footing as His words, “whom they find written with them in the Torah and the Gospel” (3). Yet it is plain that what is mentioned in the Torah is His Name, and that what Allah causes to be written in the muṣḥaf is likewise His Name. His Names, therefore, stand (4) in the position of His Speech; it is not (5) His very Essence that stands in the position of His Speech. For every entity there are four (6) modes of existence: existence in external reality, existence in minds, existence in

(1) Like the long hadith of intercession (al-shifa‘ah) reported by al-Bukhari and others. See: Sahih al-Bukhari, vol. 8, pp. 200–202; Book of Tawhid, Chapter “The Speech of the Lord—Mighty and Majestic—on the Day of Resurrection.” (2) Qur’an, al-Waqi‘ah 56:77. (3) Qur’an, al-A‘raf 7:157. (4) In the original manuscript, before the word bimanazilah (“equivalent to”), it reads “in the Torah it is his name.” The text makes sense without this phrase, which appears to have been unintentionally copied from the preceding line. (5) The manuscript reads the letter “s” for li‘anna (because), whereas the printed edition has “ṭ,” which better suits the context. (6) All copies read “four” (arba‘a), which is an error.
والأحاديث متواترة عن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - بتخصيص موسى بتكليم الله إياه دون إبراهيم وعيسى ونحوهما (١) ، وعلى قولكم لا فرق بل قد زعم من زعم من أئمتكم أن الواحد من غير الأنبياء يسمع كلام الله كما سمعه موسى بن عمران، فمن حصل له إلهام في قلبه جعلتموه قد كلمه الله كما كلم موسى بن عمران، ومعلوم أن المعتزلة لم يصلوا في الإلحاد إلى هذا الحد، بل من قال: إن الله خص موسى بأن خلق كلامًا في الهواء سمعه كان أقل بدعة ممن زعم أنه لم يكلمه إلّا بأن أفهمه معنى أراده، بل هذا قريب إلى قول المتفلسفة الذين يقولون: ليس لله كلام إلّا ما في النفوس، وإنه كلم موسى من سماء عقله، لكن يفارقونها بإثبات المعنى القديم القائم بذات الله. و-أيضًا- فجعلتم ثبوت القرآن في المصاحف مثل ثبوت الله فيها وقلتم: قوله: {إِنَّهُ لَقُرْآنٌ كَرِيمٌ (٧٧) فِي كِتَابٍ مَكْنُونٍ} (٢) بمنزلة قوله: {الَّذِي يَجِدُونَهُ مَكْتُوبًا عِنْدَهُمْ فِي التَّوْرَاةِ وَالْإِنْجِيلِ} (٣) ، ومعلوم أن المذكور في التوراة هو اسمه، وأن الله إنما يكتب في المصحف اسمه، فأسماؤه بمنزلة (٤) كلامه، لا أن (٥) ذاته بمنزلة كلامه، والشيء لوجوده أربع (٦) مراتب: وجود في الأعيان، ووجود في الأذهان، ووجود في
(١) كحديث الشفاعة الطويل الذي أخرجه البخاري وغيره. انظر: صحيح البخاري ٨/ ٢٠٠ - ٢٠٢ - كتاب التوحيد- باب كلام الرب -عزَّ وجلَّ- يوم القيامة. . (٢) سورة الواقعة، الآية: ٧٧. (٣) سورة الأعراف، الآية: ١٥٧. (٤) قبل كلمة "بمنزلة" ذكر في الأصل: "في التوراة هو اسمه". والكلام يستقيم بدونها. والذي يظهر أنه سبق نظر من الناسخ إلى مثيلتها في السطر السابق. (٥) في الأصل، س: لأن. والمثبت من: ط. ولعله المناسب لسياق الكلام. (٦) في جميع النسخ: أربعة. وهو خطأ.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies