Al-TisʿīniyyaIbn Taimiya

So look at the copy that is in your possession; another copy of it had already been brought to me. I said, “Take this copy—it is (1) my creed. Whoever objects (2) to any part of it should write down what he objects to, together with his evidence, so that I may record my reply.” They took the creed and left. They later returned with a sheet on which nothing of any objection to my words appeared; instead, they had composed a statement of their own demands. The envoy reported that they wrote one sheet, then another (3), tore them up, and finally produced this one, which reads as follows (4):

(5) “What is required of him to believe is that he must deny for Allah any direction or spatial confinement; that he must not say that the speech of Allah is letter and sound subsisting in Him, but rather a meaning inherent in His Essence; that—glorified be He—He is not to be pointed at with the fingers in any physical gesture; and that he (6) must refrain from bringing up the hadiths and verses concerning the Divine attributes in the presence of the common folk, and from writing about them to other lands or including them in fatwas related to them.”

When he showed me the sheet (7), I wrote my answer on it forthwith, even though the envoy was urging haste:

“As for the statement, ‘What is required of him to believe is that he must deny direction for Allah and spatial confinement,’ my words contain no affirmation of this (8) expression, for to employ such language…"

(1) In both the manuscript and the printed edition: “fa-hadha” (‘so this’). (2) In both the manuscript and the printed edition: “minhu” (‘from it’). (3) The phrase “thumma ukhra” (‘then another’) is omitted in both. (4) The expression “ma warada fī hādhihi al-waraqa” (‘what appears in this paper’) and the Sheikh’s—may Allah have mercy on him—concise response are found in Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā al-Mukhtaṣara (Concise Collection of Fatwas), vol. 5, pp. 264–266. (5) In the printed edition: “natlub” (‘we ask’). (6) In the printed edition: “an” (‘that’). (7) In the manuscript: “li-l-waraqa” (‘for the paper’). (8) In the printed edition: “li-hādhā” (‘for this’).
فانظروا النسخة التي عندكم، وكان قد حضر عندي نسخة أخرى منها، فقلت: خذ هذه النسخة فهي (١) اعتقادي، فمن أنكر منها (٢) شيئًا فليكتب ما ينكره وحجته لأكتب جوابي، فأخذا العقيدة وذهبا، ثم عادا ومعهما ورقة لم يذكر فيها شيء من الاعتراض على كلامي، بل قد أنشؤوا فيها كلامًا طلبوه، وذكر الرسول أنهم كتبوا ورقة ثم أخرى (٣) ، ثم قطعوها، ثم كتبوا هذه، ولفظها (٤) : الذي يطلب (٥) منه أن يعتقده أن ينفي الجهة عن الله والتحيز، وأن لا يقول إن كلام الله حرف وصوت قائم به، بل هو معنى قائم بذاته، وأنه -سبحانه- لا يشار إليه بالأصابع إشارة حسية، ويطلب منه أنه (٦) لا يتعرض لأحاديث الصفات وآياتها عند العوام، ولا يكتب بها إلى البلاد ولا في الفتاوى المتعلقة بها. فلما أراني الورقة (٧) كتبت جوابها فيها مرتجلًا مع استعجال الرسول: أما قول القائل: الذي يطلب منه أن يعتقده أن ينفي الجهة عن الله والتحيز، فليس في كلامي إثبات هذا (٨) اللفظ؛ لأن إطلاق هذا اللفظ
(١) في س، ط: فهذا. (٢) في س، ط: منه. (٣) "ثم أخرى" سقطت من: س، ط. (٤) جاء لفظ ما ورد في هذه الورقة وإجابة الشيخ -رحمه الله- عليه الإجابة المختصرة في مجموع الفتاوى ٥/ ٢٦٤ - ٢٦٦. (٥) في ط: "نطلب". (٦) في ط: "أن". (٧) في س: "للورقة". (٨) في ط: "لهذا".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies