16
Hebrew, Latin, Greek, and Syriac.
As for their assertion that it was later set down in seventy-two languages, even if that were true it could only have happened after those first four versions had already been written. Hence, if mistakes had already crept into certain passages of those four, rendering the text afterward into seventy-two tongues would not have removed those errors.
Muslims, for their part, do not claim that the book was produced in seventy-two languages and that its wording was then corrupted in every single tongue (in all seventy-two languages, in every copy thereof). What we maintain is simply that the alteration occurred earlier than that—just as is said about other transmitted works.
وَالرُّومِيَّةِ وَالْيُونَانِيَّةِ وَالسُّرْيَانِيَّةِ) .
وَأَمَّا قَوْلُهُمْ إِنَّهَا كُتِبَتْ بِاثْنَيْنِ وَسَبْعِينَ لُغَةً، فَهَذَا إِنْ كَانَ صَحِيحًا فَإِنَّمَا كُتِبَتْ بَعْدَ أَنْ كُتِبَتْ تِلْكَ الْأَرْبَعَةُ فَإِذَا كَانَ الْغَلَطُ وَقَعَ فِي مَوَاضِعَ مِنْ تِلْكَ الْأَرْبَعَةِ، لَمْ يَرْفَعْهُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ كِتَابَتُهَا بِاثْنَيْنِ وَسَبْعِينَ لُغَةً،
فَإِنَّ الْمُسْلِمِينَ لَا يَقُولُونَ:
إِنَّهَا كُتِبَتْ بِاثْنَيْنِ وَسَبْعِينَ لُغَةً غُيِّرَ لَفْظُهَا فِي جَمِيعِ الْأَلْسُنِ
(لِاثْنَيْنِ وَسَبْعِينَ لُغَةً فِي كُلِّ نُسْخَةٍ مِنْ ذَلِكَ)
.
وَإِنَّمَا يُقَالُ التَّغْيِيرُ وَقَعَ قَبْلَ ذَلِكَ كَمَا يُقَالُ فِي سَائِرِ مَا وَرَدَ