16
and Abū al-Wafāʾ ibn ʿAqīl and others.
A second opinion holds, rather, that the praiseworthiness or reprehensibility of acts can indeed be grasped by human reason.
Abū al-Khaṭṭāb Maḥfūẓ ibn Aḥmad said, “This is the view espoused by the majority of jurists and speculative theologians.”
It is the position transmitted from Abū Ḥanīfah himself; most of his disciples endorse it, along with many adherents of Mālik, al-Shāfiʿī, and Aḥmad, and a considerable number of ḥadith scholars such as Abū al-Ḥasan al-Tamīmī, Abū al-Khaṭṭāb, Abū Bakr al-Qaffāl, and Abū Naṣr
وَأَبِي الْوَفَاءِ بْنِ عَقِيلٍ وَغَيْرِهِمْ وَقِيلَ بَلْ قَدْ يُعْلَمُ حُسْنُ الْأَفْعَالِ وَقُبْحُهَا بِالْعَقْلِ.
قَالَ أَبُو الْخَطَّابِ مَحْفُوظُ بْنُ أَحْمَدَ وَهَذَا قَوْلُ أَكْثَرِ الْفُقَهَاءِ وَالْمُتَكَلِّمِينَ.
وَهَذَا هُوَ الْمَنْقُولُ عَنْ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ نَفْسِهِ وَعَلَيْهِ عَامَّةُ أَصْحَابِهِ وَكَثِيرٌ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ مَالِكٍ وَالشَّافِعِيِّ وَأَحْمَدَ وَأَهْلِ الْحَدِيثِ كَأَبِي الْحَسَنِ التَّمِيمِيِّ وَأَبِي الْخَطَّابِ وَأَبِي بَكْرٍ الْقَفَّالِ وَأَبِي نَصْرٍ