Al-Jawāb as-Sahīh li-man baddala dīn al-MasīhIbn Taimiya

and Galen and the like were not physicians; or he may go on to say, “Kūshyār, al-Khiraqī, and their peers really did master astronomy, while Ptolemy and those similar to him had no knowledge of it at all.”

If someone claims that David, Solomon, Malachi, Amos, and Daniel were prophets but that Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh was not, his contradiction is even more blatant and the falsity of his statement clearer than all of the preceding examples. The same is true of anyone who maintains that Moses and Jesus are messengers, that the Torah and the Gospel are both scriptures revealed from Allah, yet asserts that Muḥammad is not a messenger and that the Qur’an

وَجَالِينُوسَ وَنَحْوَهُمَا لَمْ يَكُونُوا أَطِبَّاءً أَوْ قَالَ: إِنَّ كُوشْيَارَ وَالْخِرَقِيَّ وَنَحْوَهُمَا كَانُوا يَعْرِفُونَ عِلْمَ الْهَيْئَةِ وَبَطْلَيْمُوسَ وَنَحْوَهُ لَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُمْ عِلْمٌ بِالْهَيْئَةِ. وَمَنْ قَالَ: إِنَّ دَاوُدَ وَسُلَيْمَانَ وَمَلِيخَا وَعَامُوصَ وَدَانْيَالَ كَانُوا أَنْبِيَاءَ وَمُحَمَّدَ بْنَ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ لَمْ يَكُنْ نَبِيًّا فَتَنَاقُضُهُ أَظْهَرُ وَفَسَادُ قَوْلِهِ أَبْيَنُ مِنْ هَذَا جَمِيعِهِ بَلْ وَكَذَلِكَ مَنْ قَالَ: إِنَّ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى رَسُولَانِ وَالتَّوْرَاةَ وَالْإِنْجِيلَ كِتَابَانِ مُنَزَّلَانِ مِنْ عِنْدِ اللَّهِ وَمُحَمَّدٌ لَيْسَ بِرَسُولٍ وَالْقُرْآنُ

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies