16
Ashhab, Ibn al-Qasim, and Ibn Wahb were jurists, whereas Malik was not, or that al-Muzani, al-Buwayti, and Harmalah were jurists, whereas al-Shafi‘i was not, and that Abu Dawud and Ibrahim al-Harbi—
وَابْنَ الْقَاسِمِ، وَابْنَ وَهْبٍ كَانُوا فُقَهَاءَ، وَمَالِكٌ لَمْ يَكُنْ فَقِيهًا، أَوْ أَنَّ الْمُزَنِيَّ وَالْبُوَيْطِيَّ وَحَرْمَلَةَ كَانُوا فُقَهَاءَ، وَالشَّافِعِيُّ لَمْ يَكُنْ فَقِيهًا، وَأَنَّ أَبَا دَاوُدَ وَإِبْرَاهِيمَ الْحَرْبِيَّ.