Al-Jawāb as-Sahīh li-man baddala dīn al-MasīhIbn Taimiya

to forsake circumcision, to embrace monasticism, or to adopt any of the other innovations they invented after him.

For this reason, once the corruption of the Christians’ religion became evident, some scholars—such as Abū ʿAbd Allāh al-Rāzī—began to say:

“Benefit from the religion of the Messiah appeared only among a small group who lived before Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him); the faith practiced by the great majority of Christians is not the Messiah’s religion.”

This becomes evident through the third consideration: suppose the law of the Scripture were indeed sufficient—such sufficiency would hold only if it had been preserved intact and put into practice. Yet that was not the case; rather, many of its landmarks had been obliterated.

Moreover, the People of the Book disagreed profoundly about the Messiah and other matters, as the Most High said:

يَأْمُرْهُمْ بِتَرْكِ الْخِتَانِ وَلَا بِالرَّهْبَانِيَّةِ وَلَا بِسَائِرِ مَا ابْتَدَعُوهُ بَعْدَهُ. وَلِهَذَا لَمَّا ظَهَرَ فَسَادُ دِينِ النَّصَارَى، صَارَ بَعْضُ النَّاسِ، كَأَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ الرَّازِيِّ يَقُولُ: " لَمْ يَظْهَرِ الِانْتِفَاعُ بِدِينِ الْمَسِيحِ، إِلَّا فِي طَائِفَةٍ قَلِيلَةٍ كَانُوا قَبْلَ مُحَمَّدٍ - صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - فَإِنَّ الدِّينَ الَّذِي كَانَ عَلَيْهِ جُمْهُورُ النَّصَارَى، لَيْسَ هُوَ دِينَ الْمَسِيحِ. وَتَبَيَّنَ هَذَا: بِالْوَجْهِ الثَّالِثِ: وَهُوَ أَنْ يُقَالَ: هَبْ إِنَّ شَرِيعَةَ الْكِتَابِ كَانَتْ كَافِيَةً، فَإِنَّمَا ذَاكَ إِذَا كَانَتْ مَحْفُوظَةً مَعْمُولًا بِهَا، وَلَمْ يَكُنِ الْأَمْرُ كَذَلِكَ، بَلْ كَانَتْ قَدْ دُرِسَ كَثِيرٌ مِنْ مَعَالِمِهَا. وَقَدِ اخْتَلَفَ أَهْلُ الْكِتَابِ فِي الْمَسِيحِ وَغَيْرِهِ اخْتِلَافًا عَظِيمًا كَمَا قَالَ تَعَالَى:

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies