and it is a lie, one that furthermore contradicts their very own assertions.

Thus, this pronouncement of the Messiah—together with his other statements and the statements of all the prophets—proves that the entity called “the Son” is nothing but the nāsūt (human nature) alone; he does not know what Allah knows. That, in itself, is explicit evidence that he is a created being, not a creator. Nor may anyone claim, as some Christians attempt, that the words are addressed to the nāsūt united with the lāhūt (divine nature) while excluding the lāhūt, for whatever the lāhūt united with the Messiah knows, the nāsūt must likewise know. Besides, in their doctrine the nāsūt by itself is not the Son apart from the united lāhūt; rather, the title “Son” refers to the lāhūt, with the nāsūt included only by virtue of the union.

Moreover, since the text affirms knowledge solely for the Father and makes no exception for the supposed eternal knowledge of the Son, it categorically denies that anyone other than the Father possesses such knowledge. This, from every perspective, overturns their doctrine.