Al-Jawāb as-Sahīh li-man baddala dīn al-MasīhIbn Taimiya

—whether by attributing to Him a partner or a child—this legislation is more complete than any that came before it. It has also closed other avenues that lead to sin, such as its prohibition of even a small amount of an intoxicant, for a little of it draws one to much.

The basic prohibitions concerning which Allah says,

“Say: My Lord has forbidden only indecencies—open and hidden—sin, wrongful transgression, that you associate with Allah anything for which He has sent down no authority, and that you say about Allah what you do not know” (Al-Aʿrāf 7:33),

are matters on which all the prophets’ laws agree. This contrasts with the forbidding of wholesome things as a punishment, something found in the Law of the Torah but not in the Law of the Quran; for Allah has made all good things lawful for the nation of Muhammad and has forbidden them only what is foul.

Likewise, perfecting monotheism in every respect and blocking every doorway that leads to polytheism are distinctive features of this Sharia, even though all the prophets unanimously commanded monotheism and forbade assigning to Allah any partner or child.

Therefore, if the Messiah—peace be upon him—meant by “the Son” only the nāsūt (human nature), and he never called the lāhūt (divine nature) “Son,” and it has been stated that the Son does not know the Hour, then it is clear that the Messiah is only the human nature and that he does not know the Hour; and this is the truth.

But if they claim that by “the Son” he meant the lāhūt, or both the lāhūt and the nāsūt together, it would necessarily follow that the divine nature—or the union of the two—does not know the Hour, and this is false.

الشَّرِيكُ وَالْوَلَدُ أَكْمَلَ مِنْ غَيْرِهَا مِنَ الشَّرَائِعِ، كَمَا سَدَّتْ غَيْرَ ذَلِكَ مِنَ الذَّرَائِعِ، مِثْلَ تَحْرِيمِهَا قَلِيلَ الْمُسْكِرِ ; لِأَنَّهُ يَجُرُّ إِلَى كَثِيرِهِ، فَإِنَّ أُصُولَ الْمُحَرَّمَاتِ الَّتِي قَالَ اللَّهُ فِيهَا: {قُلْ إِنَّمَا حَرَّمَ رَبِّيَ الْفَوَاحِشَ مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا وَمَا بَطَنَ وَالْإِثْمَ وَالْبَغْيَ بِغَيْرِ الْحَقِّ وَأَنْ تُشْرِكُوا بِاللَّهِ مَا لَمْ يُنَزِّلْ بِهِ سُلْطَانًا وَأَنْ تَقُولُوا عَلَى اللَّهِ مَا لَا تَعْلَمُونَ} [الأعراف: ٣٣] . مِمَّا اتَّفَقَتْ عَلَيْهِ شَرَائِعُ الْأَنْبِيَاءِ بِخِلَافِ تَحْرِيمِ الطَّيِّبَاتِ عُقُوبَةً، فَإِنَّ هَذَا جَاءَ فِي شَرْعِ التَّوْرَاةِ دُونَ شَرْعِ الْقُرْآنِ، فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ أَحَلَّ لِأَمَةِ مُحَمَّدٍ الطَّيِّبَاتِ وَحَرَّمَ عَلَيْهِمُ الْخَبَائِثَ، وَكَذَلِكَ تَكْمِيلُ التَّوْحِيدِ مِنْ كُلِّ الْوُجُوهِ وَسَدُّ أَبْوَابِ الشِّرْكِ مِنْ كُلِّ الْوُجُوهِ، جَاءَتْ بِهِ هَذِهِ الشَّرِيعَةُ مَعَ اتِّفَاقِ الْأَنْبِيَاءِ عَلَى إِيجَابِ التَّوْحِيدِ وَتَحْرِيمِ أَنْ يُجْعَلَ لِلَّهِ شَرِيكٌ أَوْ وَلَدٌ. فَإِذَا كَانَ مُرَادُ الْمَسِيحِ عَلَيْهِ السَّلَامُ بِالِابْنِ هُوَ النَّاسُوتُ، وَهُوَ لَمْ يُسَمِّ اللَّاهُوتَ ابْنًا، وَقَدْ ذُكِرَ أَنَّ الِابْنَ لَا يَعْلَمُ السَّاعَةَ، فَتَبَيَّنَ بِذَلِكَ أَنَّ الْمَسِيحَ هُوَ النَّاسُوتُ وَحْدَهُ، وَأَنَّهُ لَا يَعْلَمُ السَّاعَةَ وَهَذَا هُوَ الْحَقُّ، وَإِنْ قَالُوا: مُرَادُهُ بِالِابْنِ اللَّاهُوتُ أَوِ اللَّاهُوتُ وَالنَّاسُوتُ لَزِمَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ أَنَّ اللَّاهُوتَ أَوِ اللَّاهُوتَ وَالنَّاسُوتَ لَا يَعْلَمُ السَّاعَةَ وَهَذَا بَاطِلٌ،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies