654 — They unanimously agree that the ruling on unintentional homicide is taken from the Qur’anic verse concerning it.
655 — They unanimously agree that if someone strikes a man with a sword, a knife, or the point of a spear, retaliatory execution (qiṣāṣ) becomes due.
656 — They unanimously agree that unintentional killing is exemplified by a person who aims at an object but his missile strikes someone else instead.
657 — They unanimously agree that, when the killer is a slave, the slave must be surrendered in a homicide case; Mālik alone dissented and rejected this.
658 — They unanimously agree that ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb (may Allah have mercy on him) would not impose the ḥadd except on one whose guilt he had verified [lā yuḥaddu illā ʿalā man ʿalimahu][1].
659 — They unanimously agree that the head of state (imām) may impose discretionary punishment (taʿzīr) in certain matters.
660 — They unanimously agree that banishment is obligatory for an unmarried fornicator; al-Nuʿmān and Ibn al-Ḥasan were the sole dissenters.
661 — They unanimously agree that if a man has intercourse with a slave girl who is maḥram to him, he is a fornicator; the same ruling applies to an umm walad, a mudabbara, a mukātaba, and a slave who is partly emancipated—that is, if he confesses to the act of zinā, the ḥadd is carried out upon him.
662 — They unanimously agree that if a female slave commits zinā and is then set free, she is punished with the ḥadd prescribed for slave women; and if she committed zinā while unaware that she had already been emancipated, then learnt of her freedom after receiving the slave-women’s ḥadd, the remainder of the full ḥadd is enforced upon her. They further agree that no ḥadd is incurred by one who slanders a mukātaba, a partially emancipated slave, or a mudabbara.
663 — They unanimously agree that a drunkard, on his fourth offence, is not liable to execution; the only contrary view comes from a person whose disagreement is not counted as significant[2].
664 — They unanimously agree that one free person is subject to retaliation for (the killing or injury of) another free person.
665 — They unanimously agree—and I know of no dissent on the point—that if a man severs the right hand of one person and the left hand of another, retaliation is exacted for both injuries.