16
or not? There are two positions. The first holds that it was indeed abrogated, yet those who adopt this view disagree over which part of the verse was repealed, presenting two sub-opinions:
The first sub-opinion is that only its opening clause was abrogated, namely His words, “Fight in the path of Allah those who fight you” (Q 2:190). They argue that this wording implies that fighting is permissible only against those unbelievers who actually take up arms, and that it is not permissible against those who do not. According to them, this ruling was subsequently abrogated by His statement, “Kill them wherever you find them” (Q 2:191).
لا؟ عَلَى قَوْلَينِ: أَحَدُهُمَا: بِأَنَّهَا مَنْسُوْخَةٌ، واخْتَلَفَ أَرْبَابُ هَذَا القَوْل في المَنْسُوْخِ مِنْهَا عَلَى قَوْلَينِ:
أَحَدُهُمَا: أنَّهُ أَوَّلُها، وَهُوَ قَولهُ: ﴿وَقَاتِلُوا فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ الَّذِينَ يُقَاتِلُونَكُمْ﴾.
قَالُوْا: وَهَذَا يَقْتَضي أَنَّ القِتَالَ مُبَاحٌ فِي حَقِّ مَنْ قَاتَلَ مِنَ الكُفَّار، وَلا يُبَاحُ فِي حَقِّ مَنْ لَمْ يُقَاتِلْ، وَهَذَا مَنْسُوْخٌ بِقَوْلِهِ: ﴿وَاقْتُلُوهُمْ حَيثُ ثَقِفْتُمُوهُمْ﴾.