Qāʿidah fī Qitāl al-KuffārIbn Taimiya

This view is a late-born innovation in Islam. It is the position of Abū Thawr, Dāwūd, and Ibn Ḥazm, and it is also reported—though without firm evidence—from al-Shāfiʿī. Ibn Ḥazm even regarded their prophet to be Zarādašt (Zoroaster). They support themselves with the report attributed to ʿAlī: “They once possessed a scripture, but when they made marriage with close blood-relatives lawful, that scripture was withdrawn.” (1)

Imām Aḥmad declared this report weak; and even if it were authentic, once the scripture has been removed, leaving no one who knows it and no community that adheres to any of its rulings, its people can no longer be counted among the People of the Book. In that case they would not be superior to the pagan Arabs—who, at the very least, still retained elements of the religion of Abraham.

Ibn Kathir says in his Tafsir (2/21): “As for the Magians (Zoroastrians), although the jizya is taken from them by analogy with the People of the Book, their slaughtered animals are not lawful to eat, nor is it permissible to marry their women. This is contrary to the opinion of Abu Thawr—ʿIbrahim ibn Khalid al-Kalbi, one of the jurists among the companions of al-Shafiʿi. When he voiced this view and it became attributed to him, the other jurists rejected it, to the point that Imam Ahmad said of him: ‘Abu Thawr is true to his name,’ meaning in this particular matter.” (1) Its chain of transmission has already been cited.
وَهَذَا القَولُ قَولٌ مُحْدَثٌ فِي الإِسلَام، وَهُوَ قُولُ أَبِي ثَورٍ، وَدَاوُد، وابنِ حَزْمٍ، وَحُكِيَ قَولًا لِلشَّافِعِيّ، وَجَعَلَ ابنُ حَزْمٍ نَبِيَّهُمْ زَرَادِشْت، وَاحَتَجُّوا بِمَا رُوِيَ عَنْ عَليٍّ: "أَنَّهُمْ كَانَ لَهُمْ كِتَابٌ، فَلَمَّا استَحَلُّوا نِكَاحَ ذَوَاتِ المَحَارِمِ رُفِعَ ذَلِكَ الكِتَابُ" (١). وَالإِمَامُ أَحْمَدُ ضَعَّفَ هَذَا الحَدِيثَ، وَبِتَقْدِير صِحَّتِهِ فَإِذَا رُفِعَ الكِتَابُ، وَلَمْ يَبْقَ مَنْ يَعْرِفُهُ، وَلَا هُمْ مُسْتَمْسِكِينَ بِشَيءٍ مِنْ شَرَائِعِهِ لَمْ يَكُونُوا مِنْ أَهْلِ الكِتَاب، وَلَمْ يَكُونُوا خَيرًا مِنَ العَرَبِ المُشْرِكَين، فَإْنَّهُمْ كَانُوا عَلَى مِلَّةِ إبْرَاهِيم.
= وقال ابن كثير في تفسيره (٢/ ٢١): (وأما المجوس فإنهم وإن أخذت منهم الجزية تبعًا وإلحاقًا لأهل الكتاب؛ فإنهم لا تؤكل ذبائحهم، ولا تنكح نساؤهم، خلافا لأبي ثور - إبراهيم بن خالد الكلبي، أحد الفقهاء من أصحاب الشافعي - لما قال ذلك واشتهر عنه، أنكر عليه الفقهاء ذلك حتى قال عنه الإمام أحمد: أبو ثور كاسمه، يعني في هذه المسألة). (١) سبق تخريجه.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies