Tawḍīḥ al-AḥkāmAbd Allah al-Bassam

I did not wish to leave this gathering before clarifying an important point—may Allah cause whomever He wills among His servants to benefit from it. The Duha prayer is firmly established by the Prophet’s own words, by his urging of the Companions, and by his approving their observance of it—all in terms that leave no room for doubt.
Among the proofs are the hadiths cited in this chapter and the report recorded by Muslim (722) in which the Prophet instructed Abu al-Darda’ to perform it, just as he had instructed Abu Hurayrah.
Muslim (720) also relates, in Abu Dharr’s narration about saying “Subhan Allah,” “La ilaha illa Allah,” and “Al-hamdu lillah” as charity for every joint, that the Prophet said: “Two rakʿahs that one of you prays at Duha will suffice for all that.”
Al-Bukhari (1128) and Muslim (718) transmit a report from ʿA’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her): “The Messenger of Allah would abandon a deed he loved to do, fearing that the people might act upon it and it then be made obligatory for them. I never saw the Messenger of Allah perform the Duha supererogatory prayer, yet I myself perform it.”
It is unthinkable that the Mother of the Believers would consistently keep up the Duha prayer without the Prophet’s knowledge, or that she would persist in an act of worship that had not been legislated. She is, after all, the one who related his statement: “Whoever introduces into this matter of ours anything that is not from it, it is rejected,” a hadith found in the two Sahihs. She explained the Prophet’s non-observance of Duha by saying that he feared it might become burdensome for his community. Indeed, she affirmed that some practices he left off as a concession were things he actually loved to do; the context of her words concerns the Duha prayer.
It is therefore astonishing that anyone would deny its sunnah status on the grounds that the Messenger of Allah did not perform it regularly, nor did Abu Bakr or ʿUmar—especially when the scholars unanimously agree that a sunnah is established by the Prophet’s statement, action, or tacit approval. Once the command to observe Duha is authenticated, no scholar versed in the Sunnah and its categories can doubt its being recommended. By the same logic, one would also have to reject the merit of the fast of David, for the Messenger of Allah did not practice it himself, even though he praised it and instructed ʿAbd Allah ibn ʿUmar to adopt it when the latter sought the most excellent form of fasting.

أحببت ألاَّ أترك المقام حتى أبين أمرًا، عسى الله أن ينفع به من شاء من عباده، لقد ثبتت صلاة الضحى من قوله ﷺ، وحثه أصحابه، وإقرارهم عليها بما لا يدع مجالاً للشك. منها أحاديث الباب، ومنها ما ثبت في صحيح مسلم (٧٢٢)؛ أنَّه ﷺ وصى بها أبا الدرداء، كما وصى بها أبا هريرة. وفي صحيح مسلم (٧٢٠) عن أبي ذر في حديث التسبيح والتهليل والتحميد، لأداء صدقات المفاصل قال: "ويجزىء عن ذلك ركعتان يركعهما أحدكم من الضحى". وفي البخاري (١١٢٨)، ومسلم (٧١٨) من حديث عائشة ﵂ قالتْ: "إن كان رسول الله ﷺ ليدع العمل -وهو يحب أن يعمل به- خشية أن يعمل به الناس، فيكتب عليهم، وما رأيت رسول الله ﷺ قط يسبح سبحة الضحى، وإني لأسبحها". ومعلوم أنَّه مما لا يَرِدُ على العقل أن تحافظ أم المؤمنين على صلاة الضحى، ولم يطلع عليها ﷺ، كما لا يظن بها أن تداوم على عبادة لم تُشرع، وهي الراوية عنه ﷺ: "من عمل عملاً ليس عليه أمرنا فهو رد" والحديث في الصحيحين، ولكنها اعتذرت عن عدم صلاة الضحى بما ذكرت؛ أنَّه خشية أن يثقل على أمته، بل قررت أنَّ بعض ما كان يدع للتخفيف، كان يحب أن يعمل به، والسياق في مقام صلاة الضحى. والعجب ممن يستدل على عدم سنيتها: بأنَّ رسول الله ﷺ لم يفعلها، ولا أبو بكر، ولا عمر، بعد اتفاق أهل العلم أنَّ السنة ما ثبت من قوله ﷺ، أو فعله، أو تقريره، فبعد ثبوت الأمر بها لا يمتري في سنيتها عالم بالسنة وأقسامها، وإلاَّ فعليه أن يئكر فضيلة صوم داود؛ لأنَّ رسول الله ﷺ لم يعمل به، مع أنه مدحه، وأمر به عبد الله بن عمر، لما أراد أن يصوم أفضل

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies