Tawḍīḥ al-AḥkāmAbd Allah al-Bassam

1237 – Samurah ibn Jundub (may Allah be pleased with him) reported that the Prophet ﷺ said, “Whoever gains ownership of a close blood-relative who is permanently a maḥram to him becomes free.” It was transmitted by Aḥmad and the Four, though a number of ḥadith masters regarded it as mawqūf (1).

Grade of the ḥadith:
The report is mawqūf (halted).

There is a difference of opinion as to whether it is marfūʿ (traced back to the Prophet) or mawqūf, yet a mawqūf report on such a matter carries the same legal force as a marfūʿ one.

The author writes: “Imam Aḥmad and the Four Sunan compilers recorded it. Scholars disagreed over its status, and many ḥuffāẓ (hadith authorities) preferred the view that it is mawqūf. Abū Dāwūd cited it as marfūʿ through the narration of Ḥammād and as mawqūf through the narration of Shuʿbah; Shuʿbah is more reliable than Ḥammād, so the mawqūf version is stronger.”

I add: Even if we accept that it is mawqūf, it still functions as marfūʿ, because this ruling cannot be reached by mere personal opinion.

Ibn al-Madīnī and al-Nasāʾī labeled the report munkar (denounced); al-Bukhārī said it is not sound; al-Tirmidhī observed that Ḍumrah has no corroboration for it and that it is erroneous. Nevertheless, Ibn al-Qaṭṭān, ʿAbd al-Ḥaqq, and Ibn Ḥazm authenticated it. The five major collectors reported it in marfūʿ form, and al-Tirmidhī stated, “The people of knowledge act upon it.”

It also has a corroborating narration from Ibn ʿUmar with a sound isnād, recorded by Ibn Mājah (2525) and Ibn al-Jārūd (972).

(1) Musnad Ahmad 5:15; Sunan Abu Dawud, no. 3949; Sunan al-Tirmidhi, no. 1365; al-Nasai, al-Sunan al-kubra 3:173; Sunan Ibn Majah, no. 2524.
١٢٣٧ - وَعَنْ سَمُرَةَ بْنِ جُنْدُبٍ ﵁ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ قَالَ: "مَنْ مَلَكَ ذَا رَحِمٍ مَحْرَمٍ، فَهُوَ حُرٌّ" رَوَاهُ أَحْمَدُ، وَالأرْبَعَةُ، وَرَجَّحَ جَمْعٌ مِنَ الحُفَّاظِ أَنَّهُ مَوْقُوفٌ (١). ــ * درجة الحديث: الحديث موقوف. وهو مُختَلَفٌ في رفعه ووقفه، والوقف له حكم الرفع. قال المؤلِّف: رواه الإمام أحمد، والأربعة، واختلف في رفعه ووقفه، فرجح جمعٌ من الحفاظ أنَّه موقوف، وأخرجه أبو داود مرفوعًا من رواية حماد، وموقوفًا من رواية شعبة، وشعبة أحفظ من حماد، فالوقف حينئذٍ أرجح. قلت: ولو فرض وقفه، فله حكم الرَّفع؛ لأنَّ هذا مما لا مجال للرَّأي فيه. قال ابن المديني والنسائي: هو حديث منكر، وقال البخاري: لا يصح، وقال الترمذي: لم يتابع ضمرة عليه، وهو خطأ، ولكن صحَّح الحديثَ: ابن القطان، وعبد الحق، وابن حزم، وقد رواه الخمسة مرفوعًا، وقال الترمذي: العمل عليه عند أهل العلم. وله شاهدٌ من حديث ابن عمر بإسنادٍ صحيح، رواه ابن ماجه (٢٥٢٥) وابن الجارود (٩٧٢).
(١) أحمد (٥/ ١٥)، أبو داود (٣٩٤٩)، الترمذي (١٣٦٥)، النسائي في الكبرى (٣/ ١٧٣)، ابن ماجة (٢٥٢٤).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies