Tawḍīḥ al-AḥkāmAbd Allah al-Bassam

Second: water by itself achieves complete purification.

Third: there is no objection to touching the impurity for the purpose of removing it, because this is not considered “using” the impurity; it is simply disposing of it. A comparable case is a pilgrim in a state of ihram wiping off perfume from his body: although both perfume and applying it are forbidden during ihram, removing it is not one of the prohibited acts even though he must come into contact with it.

Shaykh al-Islam said: “The correct view is that it is permissible—and, in the soundest of the two reports from Ahmad, not disliked—to handle an impurity when there is a need. This is also the position of the majority of jurists, for a person cannot be certain he is clear of urine until some of it has already touched him.”

8 – He took care to shield himself from the eyes of onlookers by placing a barrier between them and himself, even if only a piece of cloth or the like, for gazing at another’s private parts without necessity is forbidden.

9 – It is permissible to employ free persons even for tasks of this nature.

ثانيًا: أنه يحصل بالماء الإنقاءُ التامُّ. ثالثًا: أن مباشرة النجاسة لإزالتها لا محذورَ فيها؛ فإنَّ هذا ليس استعمالًا لها، وإنما هو تخلُّص منها، نظير ذلك: إزالةُ المحْرِمِ الطِّيبَ عنه، بجامع المنعِ مِنْ كلٍّ منهما، فإزالتُهُ ليستْ محظورًا في الإحرامِ وإن باشره. قال شيخ الإسلام: الصحيحُ جوازُ ملامسة النجاسة للحاجة، ولا يكره ذلك في أصحِّ الروايتين عن أحمد، وهو قولُ أكثر الفقهاء؛ إذ إن الاستبراء من البول لا يكون إلاَّ بعد الإصابة به. ٨ - تحفُّظه عن أعين النَّاظرين؛ وذلك بجعله بينهم وبينه حجابًا ولو من خرقة ونحوها؛ فإنَّ النظر إلى العورة بدون ضرورة محرَّم. ٩ - جوازُ استخدامِ الأحرار حتَّى في مثل هذه الأشياء. ***

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies