—because the blows land on the skin.
Points derived from the two hadiths:
-
The harshness of the Bedouins stems from their distance from learning, rulings, and etiquette: one of them implored the Prophet—who does not speak from whim—to judge only by the Book of Allah.
-
The fine character of the Prophet ﷺ: he did not reprimand the man despite his impolite manner toward him.
-
The ḥadd for the previously-married adulterer is stoning with stones until he dies. A muḥṣan is someone who has had vaginal intercourse within a valid marriage, is free, and is legally accountable.
-
The ḥadd for an adulterer who has never been married is one hundred lashes and a year’s banishment.
-
It is impermissible to accept compensation to annul the ḥudūd; accepting it amounts to consuming wealth unlawfully.
-
Whoever commits a forbidden act out of ignorance or forgetfulness is not disciplined but taught. This man ransomed the ḥadd from his son with one hundred sheep and a slave-girl, thinking it lawful and beneficial; the Prophet ﷺ merely informed him of the ruling and returned the sheep and the slave-girl.
-
The hadith establishes a general legal principle: when someone performs an act believing its cause exists, then discovers the cause is absent, the act is void and any resulting effects are reversed.
-
Al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar said that permission to dispose of property is limited to sound contracts. Ibn Daqīq al-ʿĪd added: what is taken through a defective transaction must be returned and is not lawfully owned.
-
It is permissible to appoint an agent to establish and execute the ḥudūd.
-
The ḥudūd are the responsibility of the supreme leader (imam) or his deputy; no one else may carry them out.
-
The hadith is cited as proof that a single confession suffices to establish and carry out the ḥadd; the differing views on this will be mentioned, Allah willing.