Tawḍīḥ al-AḥkāmAbd Allah al-Bassam

in three separate statements, with no return or new marriage taking place in between. Do all three divorces then become binding so that his wife is not lawful for him again until she marries another man and completes the waiting period with him? Or is it counted as only one divorce, allowing him to take her back so long as she is still in her waiting period, and, once that period ends, to marry her anew even if she has not married anyone else?

The scholars disagreed over this at great length, and a number of leading imams and scholars—among them Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and some of his followers—were persecuted for holding the view that the husband may take her back.

Here we shall present a concise summary that, God willing, will suffice.

The majority of scholars—including the four Imams—and the majority of the Companions and Successors maintained that a triple divorce uttered in a single phrase, such as “You are divorced three times,” or in separate phrases with no return or intervening marriage, counts as three.

Their proof is the ḥadith of Rukānah ibn ʿAbd Allah, who “divorced his wife al-batta (irrevocably).” When he told the Prophet ﷺ what he had done, the Prophet asked him, “By Allah, did you intend only one divorce?”

This ḥadith was transmitted by al-Shāfiʿī, Abū Dāwūd, and al-Tirmidhī, and was declared sound by Ibn Ḥibbān and al-Ḥākim.

The point of evidence lies in the Prophet’s ﷺ making the man swear that he had meant only one divorce: had he intended more, the number he intended would have taken effect.

They also cite what al-Bukhārī narrates from ʿĀʾishah: “A man divorced his wife three times. She later married another husband, who then divorced her. The Messenger of Allah ﷺ was asked whether she could return to her first husband. He said, ‘No, not until the second one tastes her sweetness as the first tasted it.’” Had the three divorces not taken effect, she would not have been barred from returning to her first husband until after consummation with the second.

They further appeal to the practice of the Companions—among them ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb (may Allah be pleased with him)—who enforced the triple divorce uttered in a single expression as three separate divorces, exactly as the husband had pronounced them, and their authority is proof enough.

بكلماتٍ ثلاثٍ، لم يتخللها رجعةٌ ولا نكاحٌ، فهل تلزمه الطلقات الثلاث، فلا تحل له زوجته إلاَّ بعد أن تنكح زوجًا غيره، وتعتد منه، أم أنها تكون طلقة واحدة، له رجعتها ما دامت في العدة، وبعد العدة يعقد عليها، ولو لم تنكح زوجًا غيره؟: اختلف العلماء في ذلك اختلافًا طويلاً عريضًا، وعُذِّب من أجل القول بالرجعة بها جماعة من الأئمة والعلماء، منهم شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية، وبعض أتباعه. ولكننا نسوق هنا ملخصًا فيه الكفاية، إن شاء الله تعالى: ذهب جمهور العلماء -ومنهم الأئمة الأربعة- وجمهور الصحابة والتابعين: إلى وقوع الطلاق الثلاث بكلمةٍ واحدةٍ، إذا قال: "أنت طالق ثلاثًا" ونحوه، أو بكلمات ولو لم يكن بينهن رجعة ولا نكاح. ودليلهم: حديث ركانة بن عبد الله "أنه طلَّق امرأته ألبتة"؛ فأخبر النبي ﷺ بذلك؟ فقال له: "والله ما أردت إلاَّ واحدة؟ ". وهذا الحديث أخرجه الشافعي، وأبو داود، والترمذي، وصححه ابن حبَّان، والحاكم. ووجه الدلالة من الحديث: استحلافه ﷺ للمطلق أنه لم يرد بـ "ألبتة" إلاَّ واحدة، فدل على أنه لو أراد بها أكثر، لوقع ما أراده. واستدلوا أيضًا بما في صحيح البخاري عن عائشة: "أن رجلاً طلَّق امرأته ثلاثًا، فتزوجت، فطلقت، فسئل رسول الله ﷺ: أتحل للأول؛ قال: لا، حتى يذوق عسيلتها كما ذاق الأول"، ولو لم تقع الثلاث، لم يمنع رجوعها إلى الأول إلاَّ بعد ذوق الثاني عسيلتها. واستدلوا أيضًا بعمل الصحابة، ومنهم عمر بن الخطاب ﵁ على إيقاع الثلاث بكلمةٍ واحدةٍ ثلاثًا، كما نطق بها المطلَّق، وكفى بهم

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies