Tawḍīḥ al-AḥkāmAbd Allah al-Bassam

to repay with excellence, and by instructing the creditor to pursue his claim with equal courtesy.
2. When the creditor asks for what is owed, the debtor must pay; for a solvent person to procrastinate is unlawful, since preventing someone from his due without excuse is sheer injustice.
3. The term maṭl (procrastination) itself implies that the prohibition on delay applies only once the creditor demands payment or otherwise shows a wish to collect his right.
4. This prohibition concerns only the solvent debtor; as for one who is poor or genuinely unable because of some impediment, he is excused and therefore not blameworthy.
5. It is forbidden to press an insolvent person and obligatory to grant him respite until ease, as Allah says: “And if someone is in hardship, then let there be postponement until ease” (al-Baqarah).
6. The apparent sense of the ḥadith is that if a debtor refers his creditor to a solvent person, the creditor is obliged to accept the referral; the juristic disagreement on this will be discussed, Allah willing.
7. By implication, if he refers him to someone who is not solvent, the transferee is not obliged to accept.
8. The scholars define a malīʾ (solvent person) as one who combines three qualities:
– Capability to pay, so he is not poor;
– Truthfulness in keeping his promise, so he is not a procrastinator;
– Susceptibility to being brought before a court, so he is not a dignitary who can use his status to avoid it, nor the transferee’s own father whom the judge would bar him from suing.
9. On the face of it, the ḥadith indicates that the debt shifts from the transferor’s liability to that of the person to whom it is transferred. The sounder view is that if the creditor accepts the transfer knowingly and willingly despite the transferee’s bankruptcy, death, procrastination, or the like, and does not stipulate the right to revert should recovery become difficult, he may not revert. However, if he is unwilling to be referred to an insolvent person—or he is willing but unaware of that person’s condition—he retains the right to revert to the original debtor when collection proves impossible or unduly burdensome. And Allah knows best.

بحُسن القضاء، وأمر الدائن بحسن الاقتضاء. ٢ - فالغريم إذا طلب حقه فإنَّ الواجب أداؤه، ويحرم على الغني مطله؛ لأنَّ الحيلولة دون حقه بلا عذر ظلم. ٣ - لفظ "مَطْل" يشعر بأنه لا يحرم التأخير إلاَّ عند طلب الغريم، أو ما يدل على رغبته في استيفاء حقه. ٤ - تحريم المَطل خاص بالغني، أما الفقير أو العاجز لشيء من الموانع فلا يحرم عليه، لأنَّه معذور. ٥ - تحريم مطالبة المعسر، ووجوب إنظاره إلى ميسرة؛ لقوله تعالى: ﴿وَإِنْ كَانَ ذُو عُسْرَةٍ فَنَظِرَةٌ إِلَى مَيْسَرَةٍ﴾ [البقرة]. ٦ - ظاهر الحديث أنَّ المدين إذا أحال غريمه على ملىء وجب عليه التحول، ويأتي الخلاف إن شاء الله. ٧ - أما مفهوم الحديث فإنَّه إذا أحاله على غير مليء، فلا يجب على المحال قبوله. ٨ - فسر العلماء "المليء" بأنَّه ما اجتمع فيه ثلاثة صفات: - أن يكون قادرًا على الوفاء، فليس بفقير. - صادقًا بوعده، فليس بمماطل. - يمكن جلبه إلى مجلس الحكم، فلا يكون ذا جاه يمتنع بجاهه، أو يكون أبًا للمحال، فلا يمكنه الحاكم من مرافعته. ٩ - ظاهر الحديث انتقال الدين من ذمة المحيل إلى ذمة المحال إليه، والصحيح أنَّ المحال إن قَبِل برضاه عالمًا بفَلَس المحال عليه، أو موته، أو مماطلته، ونحو ذلك، ولم يشترط الرجوع عند تعسر الاستيفاء، فإنَّه لا يرجع، وإن لم يكن راضيًا بالحوالة على المعسر ونحوه، أو كان راضيًا لكن يجهل حاله، فله الرجوع عند تعذر الاستيفاء أو تعسره، والله أعلم.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies