Minhāj al-ṬālibīnAn-Nawawi

Chapter: Judgement Against an Absent Defendant

Passing judgment in absentia is permissible when the plaintiff produces valid evidence and alleges that the defendant is denying the claim. If the plaintiff says, “He admits it,” his evidence is not accepted; but if he remains silent about the defendant’s stance, the sounder view is that the evidence is still heard.

The judge is not required to appoint a stand-in who would formally deny the claim on the absentee’s behalf. After the evidence is received, the judge must have the plaintiff swear that the liability truly rests with the defendant—although another opinion holds that taking the oath is only recommended. The same rulings apply to claims brought against a minor or a person of unsound mind.

If an authorised agent files the claim while the defendant is absent, no oath is administered. Should the defendant then appear and say to the plaintiff’s agent, “He has discharged me …”

باب القضاء على الغائب هو جائز إن كان عليه بينة وادعى المدعي جحوده فإن قال هو مقر لم تسمع بينته وإن أطلق فالأصح أنها تسمع وأنه لا يلزم القاضي نصب مسخر ينكر على الغائب ويجب أن يحلفه بعد البينة أن الحق ثابت في ذمته وقيل: يستحب ويجريان في دعوى على صبي أو مجنون ولو ادعى وكيل على الغائب فلا تحليف ولو حضر المدعى عليه وقال لوكيل المدعي أبرأني

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies