Muqaddima fi Usul al-TafsirIbn Taimiya

—and is even more at ease with it than with what is reported from some of the Successors, for it is more likely that the Companion heard the report directly from the Prophet (Allah bless and grant him peace) or from someone who heard it from him. Moreover, the Companions transmitted far less from the People of the Book than did the Successors; and when a Companion speaks with such certainty, how could anyone claim that he took the report from the People of the Book when they themselves had been forbidden to endorse those sources?

What matters, therefore, is that disagreements of this sort—where the correct view is unknown and rehearsing the various opinions brings no benefit—are like the reports attributed to the Prophet for which no evidence of authenticity exists: knowledge of them is inconsequential.

As for the first category, in which the sound view can in fact be determined, this material is available wherever there is a genuine need for it, and all praise is due to Allah. It is common to find in tafsir, in hadith collections, and in the accounts of the Prophet’s campaigns matters ascribed to our Prophet or to other prophets (peace and blessings be upon them all) that a rigorously sound chain of transmission overturns. The same is true of issues whose only basis is transmitted report as well as of matters that can be verified by means other than transmission.

In short, with regard to the transmitted reports that the religion truly needs, Allah has established proofs that clarify which of them are sound and which are not. It is well known that most of what is transmitted in tafsir resembles what is transmitted about the campaigns and the apocalyptic battles. For this reason Imam Ahmad said, “Three subjects have no isnad: tafsir, apocalyptic narratives, and the military campaigns.” He is also reported to have said, “They have no root,” meaning no chain of transmission, because the majority of what is related in these areas is mursal—such as the material narrated by ʿUrwa ibn al-Zubayr, al-Shaʿbi, al-Zuhri, Musa ibn ʿUqba, Ibn Ishaq, and those who followed them.

أسكن مما نقل عن بعض التابعين؛ لأن احتمال أن يكون سمعه من النبي ﷺ أو من بعض من سمعه منه أقوى؛ ولأن نقل الصحابة عن أهل الكتاب أقل من نقل التابعين، ومع جزم الصاحب فيما يقوله، فكيف يقال: إنه أخذه عن أهل الكتاب وقد نهوا عن تصديقهم؟ والمقصود أن مثل هذا الاختلاف الذي لا يعلم صحيحه، ولا تفيد حكاية الأقوال فيه، هو كالمعرفة لما يروي من الحديث الذي لا دليل على صحته وأمثال ذلك. وأما القسم الأول، الذي يمكن معرفة الصحيح منه، فهذا موجود فيما يحتاج إليه ولله الحمد، فكثيرا ما يوجد في التفسير والحديث والمغازي أمور منقولة عن نبينا ﷺ وغيره من الأنبياء صلوات الله عليهم وسلامه والنقل الصحيح يدفع ذلك، بل هذا موجود فيما مستنده النقل، وفيما قد يعرف بأمور أخرى غير النقل. فالمقصود أن المنقولات التي يحتاج إليها في الدين قد نصب الله الأدلة على بيان ما فيها من صحيح وغيره، ومعلوم أن المنقول في التفسير أكثره كالمنقول في المغازي والملاحم؛ ولهذا قال الإمام أحمد: ثلاثة أمور ليس لها إسناد: التفسير، والملاحم، والمغازي. ويروي: ليس لها أصل، أي إسناد؛ لأن الغالب عليها المراسيل، مثل ما يذكره عروة بن الزبير، والشعبي، والزهري، وموسى بن عقبة، وابن إسحاق، ومن بعدهم،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies