Fiqh al-Adiyah wa-al-AdhkarAbd al-Razzaq ibn Abd al-Muhsin al-Badr

After that comes the third category, as in his words: (O Allah, distance me from my sins as You have distanced the East from the West …), and so on …” Here end his words—may Allah have mercy on him.1

He—may Allah have mercy on him—had established in several of his works a beneficial principle concerning acts of worship prescribed by the Sacred Law in various forms: they should be performed in all the forms that have been transmitted. He—may Allah have mercy on him—said:

“It has previously been explained in several places that when the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—performed an act of worship in various forms, it is prescribed to perform it in all those forms, and none of them is disliked. Examples include the various forms of the tashahhud (testification recited while seated in prayer) and the opening supplication; performing the Witr prayer at the beginning or end of the night; reciting aloud or quietly during the night prayer; the various readings in which the Quran was revealed; the various forms of takbīr (proclaiming Allah’s greatness) at Eid; repeating the two testimony phrases in the call to prayer or not repeating them; and reciting the phrases of the iqāma (the call immediately before prayer) once or twice …”

He—may Allah have mercy on him—then stated that this issue must be considered from two perspectives. The first concerns the permissibility of all these forms without any of them being disliked. The second is that when the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—performed an act in several different forms, even if one of them is said to be superior, following the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—by sometimes performing it in one form and sometimes in another is better than adhering exclusively to one and abandoning the other. This is because the best guidance is the guidance of Muhammad—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—and he certainly did not consistently adhere to a single opening supplication.”2

He—may Allah have mercy on him—also said: “When we say that varying these remembrances is better, this means that variation as a general practice is superior. A less preferable form may nevertheless be more beneficial for some people because it suits them and enables them to derive fuller benefit from it. This is the case with most people: they may benefit from the less preferable form because it suits

(1) *Majmūʿ al-Fatāwā*, 22:394–395. (2) See *Majmūʿ al-Fatāwā*, 22:336–343.
وبعده النوعُ الثالث، كقوله: (اللَّهمَّ باعِد بينِي وبين خطاياي كما باعدت بين المشرق والمغرب ... الخ) ... ". اهـ كلامه رحمه الله١. وكان ﵀ قد قرَّر في مواضع من مؤلفاته قاعدةً نافعةً تتعلَّق بالعبادات التي جاءت في الشريعة على أنواع، وهي أنَّها تُفعل على جميع تلك الأنواع الواردة، قال ﵀: "قد تقدَّم القولُ في مواضعَ أنَّ العبادات التي فعلها النَّبِيُّ ﷺ على أنواعٍ يُشرَع فعلُها على جميع تلك الأنواع، لا يكره منها شيء، وذلك مثلُ أنواع التشهدات، وأنواع الاستفتاح، ومثل الوتر أول الليل وآخرَه، ومثلُ الجهر بالقراءة في قيام الليل والمخافتة، وأنواع القراءات التي أُنزل القرآن عليها، والتكبير في العيد، ومثلُ الترجيع في الأذان وتركه، ومثلُ إفراد الإقامة وتثنيتها ... "، ثم ذكر ﵀ أنَّ الكلامَ في هذه المسألة من مقامَين: أحدهما: في جواز تلك الوجوه كلِّها بلا كراهة، والمقامُ الثاني: هو أنَّ ما فعله النَّبِيُّ ﷺ من أنواعٍ متنوِّعة، وإنْ قيل إنَّ بعضَ تلك الأنواع أفضلُ، فالاقتداءُ بالنَّبيِّ ﷺ في أن يُفعل هذا تارةً وهذا تارة أفضلُ من لزوم أحد الأمرين وهجر الآخر، وذلك أنَّ أفضلَ الهدي هديُ محمد ﷺ، ولم يكن يُداومُ على استفتاح واحد قطعاً"٢. وقال ﵀: "ونحن إذا قلنا التنوُّعُ في هذه الأذكار أفضلُ، فهو أيضاً تفضيلٌ لجِنس التنوُّع، والمفضولُ قد يكون أنفعَ لبعض الناس لمناسبته له لأنَّ انتفاعَه به أتمُّ، وهذه حالُ أكثر الناس، قد ينتفعون بالمفضول لمناسبته
١ مجموع الفتاوى (٢٢/٣٩٤ ـ ٣٩٥) . ٢ انظر: مجموع الفتاوى (٢٢/٣٣٦ ـ ٣٤٣) .

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies