al-Moulakhas al-FiqhiSalih Al-Fawzan

been concluded, and the right adjudicated now belongs to the party in whose favor it was decided. Since both witnesses are suspected of seeking to overturn the ruling, the judgment remains in force, but they are held liable: they must guarantee the value of the property concerning which they testified, for by their false testimony they removed it from its rightful owner and prevented him from taking possession of it.

If a judge passes judgment on the basis of a single witness together with the plaintiff’s oath, and that witness then retracts, he must pay the entire amount, because his testimony constituted the legal proof of the claim, whereas the oath is merely the statement of one litigant and is not itself acceptable against the other; it functions only as a procedural condition for issuing the verdict.

Should the witnesses withdraw their testimony before judgment is rendered, the testimony is cancelled, no sentence is passed, and no liability is incurred. Allah knows best.

تم، ووجب المشهود به للمشود له، وهما متهمان بإرادة نقض الحكم، فينفذ الحكم، ويلزمهم الضمان؛ بأن يضمنوا المال الذي شهدوا به؛ لأنهم أخرجوه من يد مالكه بغير حق، وحالوا بينه وبينه. وإن حكم القاضي بشاهد ويمين، ثم رجع الشاهد؛ غرم المال كله؛ لأنه حجة للدعوى، واليمين قول الخصم، وقول الخصم ليس مقبولاً على خصمه، وإنما هو شرط للحكم. وإن رجع الشهود عن الشهادة قبل الحكم؛ ألغي، ولا حكم ولا ضمان، والله أعلم.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies