The discussion here revolves around three issues:
First: imitating him (1) in the mere outward form of an act he performed, without knowing the intention behind it, or when the reason that prompted it is no longer present. This is a well-known point of contention. Ibn ʿUmar, together with a group of scholars, holds one view, while others differ from them (2). The prevailing and well-attested practice of the Emigrants and the Helpers was that they did not act as Ibn ʿUmar did—and that, in any case, is not the matter now under consideration (3).
Under this heading also falls the situation of a traveler who deliberately waits until the time of prayer arrives so that he may pray in a spot where the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—once encamped and prayed; this, too, belongs to the same category.
Second: that a person chooses that specific place in order to pray there when it is not the prescribed time for prayer, intending thereby (4) to initiate a voluntary prayer and supplication solely because of the spot itself. Nothing of this sort is reported from Ibn ʿUmar or anyone else (5). Even were someone to claim that Ibn ʿUmar did so, it is firmly established that his father ʿUmar forbade it (6), and it is mass-transmitted from the Emigrants and the Helpers that they never did it. Hence, Ibn ʿUmar’s action—assuming it occurred—cannot serve as evidence against his father or against the Emigrants and the Helpers.
Third: that the place is not on one’s route at all; rather, a person diverts from his path to reach it, or undertakes a short or long journey to it—such as one who travels to Ḥirāʾ in order to pray and supplicate there, or who journeys to the mountain where Allah spoke to Moses, peace be upon him, to pray and supplicate.