He said, “By Your might, I shall not leave until a fish comes out for me.” A huge fish then surfaced—so the report goes.
When this reached al-Junayd he remarked, “I would have preferred that a serpent had come out and killed him.”
It is likewise related that one of the residents of Madinah once came to the grave of the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—and felt a craving for a certain kind of food. A member of the Hāshimite family approached him and said, “The Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—has sent this to you and says: ‘Leave our precincts, for whoever stays with us does not yearn for such things.’”
Others had their needs fulfilled and were not addressed in this manner—whether because they were exercising ijtihād, following another’s judgement, or were deficient in knowledge. The ignorant is forgiven for what the knowledgeable is not, just as is narrated about Barakh the devotee who sought rain for the Children of Israel.
For this reason, most of the anecdotes in this vein involve people of limited understanding; were such conduct truly part of the Sacred Law, those of deeper knowledge would have been the first to adopt it.
Nor may it be said, “Because their knowledge was deficient it became permissible for them,” for Allah has granted no one such licence. A lack of knowledge only leaves room for hope of pardon and forgiveness.
As for declaring the disliked commendable or permitting what is forbidden, we draw no distinction between pardon for