who rely on those funds to help them worship God alone, without partner—this is praiseworthy. Among the places in question are some that people imagine to be the grave of a prophet or a righteous man, though they are not; or that they suppose to be a station associated with him, though in fact they are not. As for a site that truly is his grave or his station, that belongs to the second category (1).
[Some of the sites and graves that people have innovated]
This is a vast subject, and I shall mention only a few concrete examples:
First, there are several locations in Damascus. One of them is a shrine dedicated to Ubayy ibn Kaʿb situated outside the Eastern Gate. Yet there is no disagreement among the scholars that Ubayy ibn Kaʿb died in Madinah and not in Damascus. God knows whose grave it really is, but it is certainly not the grave of Ubayy ibn Kaʿb, the Companion of the Messenger of God (2).
Likewise, on the southern wall of the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus (3) there is a spot that people claim contains the grave of the Prophet Hūd, peace be upon him. I know of no scholar who has ever maintained that the Prophet Hūd died in Damascus. Rather, it has been said that he died in Yemen, and others have said that he died in Mecca—for his mission began in Yemen, and after the destruction of his people he migrated to Mecca. As for al-Shām, it was neither his homeland (4) nor his place of migration; hence for him to have died there—especially when the scholars do not mention it and, in fact, report the contrary—is exceedingly improbable.
There is also a shrine outside the Western Gate of Damascus said to be the grave of Uways al-Qaranī (5). I have never encountered anyone who claims that Uways died in Damascus, nor that he ever even headed toward the city