And the Prophet ﷺ said, “Prayer is light,” and similar reports.
We reply: There is no doubt that anyone who engages in such a practice while interpreting the matter through ijtihād or by following a scholar is rewarded for the sincerity of his intention and for that aspect of the act that is legitimately prescribed. Whatever portion of it is innovated is forgiven him so long as, in his ijtihād or imitation, he falls among those excused. Likewise, every benefit that has been attributed to such observances is attained only because they contain elements whose very kind is sanctioned—fasting, remembrance (dhikr), recitation, bowing, prostration, and the earnest resolve to worship Allah, obey Him, and call upon Him. As for the disliked components they include, their harmful effect is lifted by Allah’s pardon on account of the practitioner’s ijtihād or imitation. This principle holds true for every benefit mentioned in connection with certain disapproved innovations.
Yet that fact does not negate the reprehensibility of the practice, the prohibition of it, or the need to replace it with an act that is prescribed and free of innovation—just as those who added a call to prayer (adhān) for the two Eid prayers are similarly addressed. Indeed, Jews and Christians also perceive benefits in their acts of worship, for their rituals must contain some element whose genus is originally sanctioned, and their statements must necessarily include some truth transmitted from the prophets. Nevertheless, this in no way obliges us to perform their acts of worship or relate their words, because every innovation must contain an evil that outweighs whatever good it possesses; had its good outweighed its evil, the Sacred Law would never have set it aside. We therefore infer