Kayfa Nastafid min al-Kutub al-Hadithiyah al-SittahAbd al-Muhsin al-‘Abbad

I have indicated where those narrations occur in benefit 254 of my book Selected Benefits from Fatḥ al-Bārī and Other Works.

Al-Bukhārī’s practice of distributing a single report across several chapter headings means that some ḥadiths appear in places where one would not normally expect to find them. Because of this, a number of scholars supposed that the Ṣaḥīḥ lacked certain traditions. That is precisely what happened to al-Ḥākim—may Allah have mercy on him—in his Mustadrak: he claimed to “add” several reports to al-Bukhārī, asserting that they were not included, even though they are in the Ṣaḥīḥ.

One illustration is ḥadith 2284, which al-Bukhārī cites in the Book of Hiring concerning the prohibition of taking a stud fee (ʿasb al-faḥl). Al-Ḥākim listed this narration as a supplement to al-Bukhārī and thereby erred. Al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar comments on the ḥadith: “He was mistaken in his supplementation; the report is in al-Bukhārī, as you can see. Because he did not find it in the Book of Sales, he assumed that al-Bukhārī had omitted it.”

وقد ذكرت مواضع تلك الأحاديث في الفائدة (٢٥٤) من كتابي "الفوائد المنتقاة من فتح الباري وكتب أخرى". وهذه الطريقة التي اتَّبعها البخاري في تفريقه الأحاديث على الأبواب ترتَّب عليها وجودُ بعض الأحاديث في غير مَظنَّتها، فظنَّ بعضُ العلماء خلوَّ الكتاب منها كما حصل للحاكم ﵀ في المستدرك حيث استدرك على البخاري أحاديث، وقال إنَّه لم يخرجها مع وجودها في صحيح البخاري، ومن أمثلة ذلك الحديث الذي رواه البخاري (٢٢٨٤) في كتاب الإجارة في النهي عن عَسْب الفَحْل، فقد استدركه الحاكم على البخاري فوهم، قال الحافظ في شرح الحديث: "وقد وهم في استدراكه، وهو في البخاري كما ترى، وكأنّه لَمّا لَم يره في كتاب البيوع توهم أنَّ البخاري لم يخرجه".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies