Sujūd al-TilāwahIbn Taimiya

of ʿUthmān and others indicates that it is obligatory.

It may also be said that what ʿUmar intended was that prostration has not been prescribed for us in this specific situation—namely, when the imam recites the verse while on the pulpit. This is clarified by the fact that prostration here is unlike unrestricted prostration, for the imam would have to interrupt the sermon and engage in considerable movement, whereas the sunnah for the khutbah is to maintain continuity. When these two considerations conflict, the prostration ceases to be obligatory, because the reciter is already occupied with a superior act of worship: addressing the people with the sermon. Yet, were he to prostrate, it would still be permissible.

For this reason Mālik and others say, “This prostration is not recommended.” He adds, “The practice among us is that the imam does not prostrate if he recites it on the pulpit, just as he did not regard prostration as recommended in…"

عثمان وغيره يدل على الوجوب. ثم يقال: قد يكون مراد عمر أنه لم يكتب علينا السجود في هذه الحال، وهو إذا قرأها الإمام على المنبر. يبين ذلك أن السجود في هذه الحال ليس كالسجود المطلق؛ لأنه يقطع فيه الإمام الخطبة، ويعمل عملا كثيراً. والسنة في الخطبة الموالاة، فلما تعارض هذا وهذا صار السجود غير واجب؛ لأن القارئ يشتغل بعبادة أفضل منه، وهو خطبة الناس وإن سجد جاز. ولهذا يقول مالك وغيره: إن هذا السجود لا يستحب، قال: وليس العمل عندنا على أن يسجد الإمام إذا قرأ على المنبر، كما أنه لم يستحب السجود في

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies