Zād al-MustaqniʿAl-Hajjawi

—against the defendant1. If, however, the defendant denies the claim, the judge says to the claimant, “If you have evidence, then bring it—if you wish.” Should he produce it, the judge hears it and issues judgment2 on its basis; he does not judge by relying on his own personal knowledge. If the claimant says, “I have no evidence,” the judge informs him that he has the right to demand an oath from his opponent in accordance with the latter’s reply. If the claimant then asks3 that the defendant be put on oath, the judge administers the oath and dismisses him. The defendant’s oath counts for nothing until the claimant has requested it. If the defendant refuses, judgment is entered against him, the judge saying, “If you swear, well and good; otherwise I shall rule against you.” If he still will not swear, judgment is rendered against him. Yet if the defendant does take the oath and the claimant later brings4 his evidence5, the judge decides on the strength of that evidence; the oath does not annul the right6.

Section

A lawsuit is valid only when the claim is precisely formulated and the thing claimed is clearly identified, except in those cases where the law allows an unspecified claim, such as a bequest or saying, “one of his slaves as her dower,” and the like.

If someone alleges a marriage contract, a sale, or any other contract, he must state its conditions. If a woman claims that she is married to a man in order to claim maintenance, her dower, or something similar, her suit is heard; but if she merely alleges the marriage itself, it is not accepted. Whoever claims inheritance must state the cause that entitles him to it.

The uprightness of the witnesses must be verified both outwardly and inwardly; and if a witness’s reliability is unknown, the judge is to inquire about it.

(1) In manuscript B: “wa ʿalayhi”. (2) In manuscript B: “lahu biha”. (3) In manuscript B: “saʾala”. (4) Manuscript B omits the word “al-muddaʿi”. (5) Manuscripts B, C and M read “bayyina”. (6) In manuscript B: “lil-ʿaqd”.
عليه١ وإن أنكر قال للمدعي: إن كان لك بينة فأحضرها "إن شئت" فإن أحضرها سمعها وحكم٢ بها ولا يحكم بعلمه وإن قال المدعي: مالي بينة أعلمه الحاكم أن له اليمين على خصمه "على صفة جوابه" فإن سأله٣ إحلافه أحلفه وخلى سبيله. ولا يعتد بيمينه قبل مسألة المدعي وإن نكل قضي عليه فيقول: إن حلفت وإلا قضيت عليك فإن لم يحلف قضي عليه فإن حلف المنكر ثم إن أحضر المدعي٤ بينته٥ حكم بها ولم تكن اليمين مزيلة للحق٦. فصل ولا تصح الدعوى إلا محررة معلومة المدعى به إلا ما نصححه مجهولا كالوصية "وعبد من عبيده مهرا ونحوه". وإن ادعى عقد نكاح أو بيع أو غيرهما فلابد من ذكر شروطه وإن ادعت امرأة نكاح رجل لطلب نفقة أو مهر أو نحوهما سمعت دعواها وإن لم تدع سوى النكاح لم تقبل وإن ادعى الإرث ذكر سببه. وتعتبر عدالة البينة ظاهرا وباطنا "ومن جهلت عدالته سأل
١في "ب": وعليه. ٢في "ب": له بها. ٣في "ب": سأل. ٤سقط من "ب": المدعي. ٥في "ب" و "ج" و "م": بينة. ٦في ب": للعقد.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies