Zād al-MustaqniʿAl-Hajjawi

and that he actually remove it from the place of safekeeping; for if he steals it from a place that is not a hirz, no amputation is carried out. A hirz for property is whatever people customarily use to protect it, and this differs according to the type of goods, the country, and the ruler’s justice or tyranny, strength or weakness. Thus the hirz for money, jewels, and cloth is in houses, shops, and inhabited buildings1 behind firmly locked doors. The hirz for vegetables, pots of beans, and the like is behind wooden screens provided there is a guard in the marketplace. The hirz for firewood, grain, and haystacks—and for livestock, the paddocks—and when the animals are on open pasture their hirz is the shepherd2 and his regular oversight, as is usually the case.

Another condition is that any possibility of shared ownership be ruled out: there is no amputation for stealing from one’s father’s property, no matter how far up the line, nor from one’s child’s property, no matter how far down; in this the father and mother are the same. A brother, however, and any other relative is liable for stealing the property of a kinsman. Neither spouse is amputated for taking from the other’s property, even if it had been kept from him or her.

Likewise, no amputation is imposed if a slave steals from his master’s property, or a master from the property of his mukatab, or a free person from the public treasury, or from war booty before the khums has been set aside, or a poor person from the income of an endowment designated for the poor, or anyone from property in which he himself owns a share—whether with the victim or with someone from whom amputation is not prescribed.

The penalty is enforced only on the testimony of two upright witnesses, or on a confession repeated twice; and once he has confessed, he is not allowed to retract until the sentence has been carried out.

The victim must also lodge a claim for his property.

When all the conditions are met, the offender’s right hand is cut off at the wrist joint and the stump is cauterized.

(1) The lacuna in manuscript J ends here. (2) Manuscripts J and M read: “bil-raʿi” (with the shepherd).
وأن يخرجه من الحرز فإن سرقه من غير حرز فلا قطع وحرز المال: ما العادة حفظه فيه ويختلف باختلاف الأموال والبلدان وعدل السلطان وجوره وقوته وضعفه فحرز الأموال والجواهر والقماش في الدور والدكاكين والعمران١ وراء الأبواب والأغلاق الوثيقة وحرز البقل وقدور الباقلاء ونحوهما وراء الشرائج إذا كان في السوق حارس وحرز الحطب والخب والحظائر وحرز المواشي الصير وحرزها في المرعى الراعي٢ ونظره إليها "غالبا". وأن تنتفي الشبهة فلا يقطع بالسرقة من مال أبيه وإن علا ولا من مال ولده وإن سفل والأب والأم في هذا سواء ويقطع "الأخ" وكل قريب بسرقة مال قريبه ولا يقطع أحد من الزوجين بسرقته من مال الآخر ولو كان محرزا عنه وإذا سرق عبد من مال سيده "أو سيد من مال مكاتبه", "أو حر" مسام من بيت المال أو من غنيمة لم تخمس "أو فقير من غلة وقف على الفقراء" أو شخص من مال له فيه شركة له أو لأحد ممن لا يقطع بالسرقة منه لم يقطع. ولا يقطع إلا بشهادة عدلين أو بإقرار مرتين ولا ينزع عن إقراره حتى يقطع. وأن يطالب المسروق منه بماله. وإذا وجب القطع قطعت يده اليمنى من مفصل الكف وحسمت.
١إلى هنا ينتهي السقط في "ج". ٢في "ج" و "م": بالراعي.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies