Dalīl al-ṬālibMarʿi al-Karmi

Section on Leading the Prayer (Imāmah)

The person most entitled to lead is the one whose Qur’anic recitation is the finest and whose grasp of jurisprudence is the soundest. A proficient reciter who does not know the detailed rulings of the prayer nevertheless takes precedence over a jurist who is illiterate. After that comes the eldest, then the noblest in lineage, then the most God-fearing and scrupulous; if equality remains, lots are drawn.

The host in his own home and the appointed imam of a mosque—even if he is a slave—have a stronger claim. A free man is preferred to a slave. Likewise, the resident, the sighted, and the worshipper who has performed ablution have precedence over, respectively, the traveller, the blind, and the one who is praying with dry ablution.

It is disliked to lead the prayer in place of someone more entitled without his permission.

The leadership of an open sinner (fāsiq) is invalid except for Friday and ʿĪd prayers when no other imam is available. Valid, however—though disliked—is the leadership of a blind man, a deaf man¹, an uncircumcised man², one who makes many pronunciation errors so long as they do not change the meaning³, and a stammerer who repeats the letter t⁴.

The leadership of anyone unable to fulfil a prerequisite or an essential pillar is invalid unless the congregation shares the same inability—apart from the supreme leader (al-Imām).

(1) Manuscripts M, N, and J read: “the blind and the deaf,” which is also the wording adopted in Al-Muntaha, vol. 1, p. 112, and Al-Ghayah, vol. 1, p. 198. (2) Al-Labadi comments (p. 83) that this ruling applies only when the person has not deliberately neglected circumcision without excuse; otherwise he is a fasiq (open sinner) and his leadership of the prayer is invalid. He further notes that Al-Ghayah states: “It is disliked for an uncircumcised man to lead the prayer, yet the ruling becomes prohibition if, after puberty, he persists in avoiding circumcision without excuse, because that constitutes fisq.” The same conclusion was affirmed by our shaykh’s shaykh and is explicitly stated in Al-Insaf. (3) Examples of minor linguistic slips include pronouncing the dal of “al-hamdu” without its final vowel, putting the ha of “Allah” in the accusative, or giving the ba of “rabb” a fatḥa. Whether the congregation makes the same mistakes or not, the meaning of the words—the recognized speech of the Lord—remains, so the prayer is valid, though disliked. See Nail al-Maarib, vol. 1, p. 177. (4) Manuscript M adds: “in all cases, because scholars differ over the validity of their imamate.”
فصل في الإمامة الأولى بها الأجود قراءة الأفقه ويقدم قارئ لا يعلم فقه صلاته على فقيه أمي ثم الأسن ثم الأشرف ثم الأتقى والأورع ثم يقرع. وصاحب البيت وإمام المسجد ولو عبدا أحق. والحر أولى من العبد. والحاضر والبصير والمتوضئ أولى من ضدهم. وتكره إمامة غير الأولى بلا إذنه. ولا تصح إمامة الفاسق إلا في جمعة وعيد تعذرا خلف غيره وتصح إمامة الأعمى والأصم١ والأقلف٢ وكثير لحن لم يحل المعنى٣ والتمتام الذي يكرر التاء مع الكراهة.٤ ولا تصح إمامة العاجز عن شرط أو ركن إلا بمثله إلا الإمام.
١ في "م", "ن", "ج" "الأعمى, والأصم", والمثبت لفظ المنتهى"١/١١٢", والغاية "١/١٩٨". ٢ قال اللبدي في حاشية "ص: ٨٣": أي ما لم يكن تاركا للاختتان بلا عذر, وإلا فيكون فاسقا, فلا تصح إمامته, هذا ما ظهر لي والله أعلم. ثم رأيت في الغاية ما نصه: وتكره إمامته الأقلف, ويتجه: لا إن ترك الختان بالغا مصرا بلا عذر, لفسقه, وقال شيخ مشايخنا؛ وهو مصرح به في الإنصاف. ٣ كجرد دال "الحمد" ونصب هاء "لله" ونصب باء "رب" ونحو ذلك, سوء كان المؤتم مثله أو كان لا يلحن, لأن مدلول اللفظ باق, وهو مفهوم كلام الرب ﷾, لكن مع الكراهة. نيل المآرب "١/١٧٧". ٤ في "م" زيادة: "في الكل, للخلاف في صحة إمامتهم".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies