Dalīl al-ṬālibMarʿi al-Karmi

Section

For testimonial evidence to be admitted, the witnesses must be upright1—both outwardly and inwardly2.

The judge is entitled to act on his own knowledge with regard to what has been acknowledged before him in court and with regard to the probity or immorality of the witnesses.

Should he harbor doubt about them, certification (tazkiyah) by reliable endorsers becomes necessary. If the claimant asks the judge to detain his adversary3 until the latter produces someone who can vouch for his evidence, the judge grants the request and waits for him three days. If he does4 bring such endorsers, the judge verifies that their knowledge of the person they are certifying is based on actual companionship and business dealings.

If the adversary alleges that the endorsers are immoral—or that the certified witnesses themselves are immoral—and he supports that allegation with evidence, his evidence is admitted and the testimony is nullified.

Neither endorsement (taʿdīl) nor discreditation (jarḥ) is accepted from women.

Whenever the claimant’s witnesses are shown to be immoral, or he states at the outset, “I have no evidence,” the judge declares, “You have nothing against your opponent except his oath.” The defendant then swears in accordance with the tenor of his earlier reply to the claim, he is released, and it thereafter becomes impermissible to make him swear again. And if

(1) Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyya comments: “Whoever claims that the human being’s default state is uprightness (‘adala) is mistaken; the default is wrongdoing and ignorance, as Allah says: ‘Indeed, he has always been unjust and ignorant’ (Quran 33:72).” Nayl al-Maarib, 2/454. (2) The inward state is not taken into account when concluding a marriage contract. Nayl al-Maarib, 2/454. (3) Variant readings: manuscript A reads “habs gharimihi” (to imprison his debtor) instead of “an yahbisa gharimahu”; manuscript B has “gharayimahu” in place of “gharimahu.” (4) Manuscript N reads “fa idha” instead of “fa in.”
فصل ويعتبر في البينة: العدالة١ ظاهرا وباطنا٢. وللحاكم أن يعمل بعمله فيما أقربه في مجلس حكمه وفي عدالة البينة وفسقها. فإن ارتاب منها: فلا بد من المزكين لها فإن طلب المدعي من الحاكم أن يحبس٣ غريمه حتى يأتي بمن يزكي بينته: أجابه لما سأل وانتظره ثلاثة أيام فإن٤ أتى بالمزكين اعتبر معرفتهم لمن يزكونه بالصحبة والمعاملة. فإن ادعى الغريم فسق المزكين أو فسق البينة المزكاة وأقام بذلك بينة سمعت وبطلت الشهادة. ولا يقبل: من النساء تعديل ولا تجريح. وحيث ظهر فسق بينة المدعي أو قال ابتداء: ليس لي بينة قال الحاكم: ليس لك على غريمك إلا اليمين فيحلف الغريم على صفة جوابه في الدعوى ويخلى سبيله ويحرم تحليفه بعد ذلك. وإن كان
١ قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية: ومن قال الأصل في الإنسان العدالة فقد أخطأ وإنما الأصل فيه الظلم والجهل لقوله تعالى: ﴿إِنَّهُ كَانَ ظَلُوماً جَهُولاً﴾ [الأحزاب:٧٢] نيل المآرب "٢/٤٥٤". ٢ ولا تعتبر باطنا في عقد نكاح. نيل المآرب "٢/٤٥٤". ٣ في "أ" "حبس غريمه" بدل "أن يحبس غريمه". وفي "ب" "غرائمة" بدل: "غريمة". ٤ في "ن" "فإذا" بدل: "فإن".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies