Dalīl al-ṬālibMarʿi al-Karmi
  1. The article taken must qualify in Sacred Law as property. Therefore, no amputation is imposed for stealing water, a container that merely holds wine or water, a Qur’an codex, its attached ornaments, books of heretical innovation1 or pictorial images, a musical instrument, or a cross or an idol.

  2. The property must reach the legal threshold (nisab): three dirhams, a quarter-dinar, or whatever equals either of them in value, the valuation being calculated at the moment it is removed.

  3. The item must be taken from a secure place (ḥirz). If it is taken from somewhere that is not a ḥirz, no amputation is due. For every type of wealth, a ḥirz is whatever people customarily use to safeguard it; a shoe while on one’s foot and a turban while on one’s head both count as a ḥirz. What constitutes a ḥirz differs from one land to another and according to the ruling authorities2.
    If several people collaborate both in breaching the ḥirz and in removing property amounting to the nisab, all of them are to have their hands cut off; but if one of them breaches the ḥirz and another enters and carries out the property, neither is amputated, even if they had agreed beforehand.

  4. Any ownership-related doubt (shubha) must be absent. Hence, no amputation is carried out when a person steals3 from the property of his descendants, ascendants, or wife4, nor when he steals from property in which he or any of these has a joint share.

  5. The theft must be proven either by the testimony of two upright witnesses—who must describe the act and whose testimony is not accepted before the victim lodges a claim—or by the thief’s own confession given twice, which he may not retract until the sentence is executed.

  6. The owner of the stolen property must demand its return5.

(1) In manuscript M the reading is bidʿa (innovation). (2) In manuscript M the phrase appears as al-salatin, omitting the prepositional particle bi-. (3) In manuscript A the reading is bi-sariqa (for theft). (4) In manuscript A the reading is zawjatuhu (his wife); the same appears in M and N. (5) In manuscript N the reading is bi-mal (for property).
الثالث: كون المسروق مالا لكن لا قطع بسرقة الماء ولا بإناء فيه خمر أو ماء ولا بسرقة مصحف ولا بما عليه من حلي ولا بكتب بدع١ وتصاوير ولا بآلة لهو ولا بصليب أو صنم. الرابع: كون المسروق نصابا وهو: ثلاثة دراهم أو ربع دينار أو ما يساوي أحدهما وتعتبر القيمة حال الإخراج. الخامس: إخراجه من حرز فلو سرق من غير حرز فلا قطع. وحرز كل مال: ما حفظ فيه عادة فنعل برجل وعمامة على رأس: حرز ويختلف الحرز بالبلدان وبالسلاطين٢. ولو اشترك جماعة في هتك الحرز وإخراج النصاب: قطعوا جميعا وإن هتك الحرز أحدهما ودخل الآخر فأخرج المال: فلا قطع عليهما ولو تواطأ. السادس: انتفاء الشبهة: فلا قطع بسرقته٣ من مال فروعه وأصوله وزوجه٤ ولا بسرقة من مال له فيه شرك أو لأحد ممن ذكر. السابع: ثبوتها إما بشهادة عدلين ويصفانها ولا تسمع قبل الدعوى أو بإقرار مرتين ولا يرجع حتى يقطع. الثامن: مطالبة المسروق منه بماله٥.
١ في "م" "بدعة". ٢ في "م" "والسلاطين" بدون الباء. ٣ في "أ" "بسرقة". ٤ في "أ" "زوجته". وكذا في "م" و "ن". ٥ في "ن" "بمال".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies