-
The first: any gaze that is accompanied by desire is, by unanimous agreement, forbidden.
-
The second: a gaze about which one is certain that no desire is present—such as the devout man’s look at his handsome son, his beautiful daughter, or his attractive mother. No desire attaches to this unless the man is among the most depraved of people; but whenever desire does arise, the gaze becomes unlawful.
On this basis, the gaze of a person whose heart feels no inclination toward beardless youths—just as was the case with the Companions and with nations that knew nothing of this abomination—has the same ruling. Such a man draws no distinction, in this regard, between looking at his own son, his neighbor’s son, or an unrelated boy; no thought of desire crosses his mind, for he has never become accustomed to it and his heart remains sound.
In the time of the Companions, slave-girls would walk through the streets with their heads uncovered¹ and serve men while hearts remained pure. If a man today were to allow attractive Turkish slave-girls to move about among the people in these lands and times as those earlier slave-girls once did, that would amount to sheer corruption.
Similarly, handsome beardless youths should not go out into places and alleyways where temptation is feared except when necessity demands. A good-looking youth must not be permitted to flaunt his beauty, to sit unclothed in the public bath among strangers, or to