Tamam al-MinnahNasir al-Din al-Albani

Concerning his remark on the report from ʿUmar—“Pray Jumuʿah wherever you happen to be,” adding, “This includes both cities and villages”—I say: Al-Ḥāfiẓ made the same comment in Fatḥ al-Bārī 4/380, and al-Shawkānī followed him (3/198). In fact, the wording is broader than that, for it also covers those staying at watering stations. Ibn Abī Shaybah, immediately after citing ʿUmar’s report (2/102), narrated through Ibn Idrīs from Mālik that
“the Companions of Muhammad used to observe Jumuʿah at these watering places between Mecca and Madinah.”
This is corroborated by the report of Ibn ʿUmar quoted in the book at the end of this discussion, in which it is said, “It was transmitted by ʿAbd al-Razzāq with an authentic chain.” I say: Al-Ḥāfiẓ stated that, and al-Shawkānī mentioned it without attribution—as is his wont in most of his source citations—and the author here adduced it as proof, though it is not free of difficulty. It appears in Musannaf ʿAbd al-Razzāq 3/170, 5185 through “ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿUmar, from Nāfiʿ, from Ibn ʿUmar …” The copy has the name as “ʿAbd Allāh” in the full form, and he is weak; most likely the original read “ʿUbayd Allāh” in the diminutive, who is reliable, as Al-Ḥāfiẓ’s grading of the isnād as sound indicates. Allah knows best.

He then says at the close of the section on the legal ruling of the sermon, quoting al-Shawkānī: “The stronger view is that of al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī, Dāwūd al-Ẓāhirī, and al-Juwaynī, namely that the Friday sermon is merely recommended.”

I reply: The correct opinion is that it is obligatory, and al-Shawkānī’s argument is untenable. Ṣiddīq Khān inclined to the same position in al-Rawḍah al-Nadiyyah and in al-Mawʿiẓah al-Ḥasanah, and I refuted him in my treatise al-Ajwibah al-Nāfiʿah in a manner that leaves no room for doubt regarding the obligation. Consult it, for the matter is of great importance.

He next cited the marfūʿ hadith of Jābir: “Whenever he ascended the pulpit he would greet (the congregation with salām),” declaring it weak on account of Ibn Lahīʿah, and then quoted it in mursal form from al-Shaʿbī and ʿAṭāʾ.

I say: These two mursal reports were recorded by Ibn Abī Shaybah and ʿAbd al-Razzāq, and they bolster one another.

قوله في أثر عمر: أن جمعوا حيثما كنتم: "وهذا يشمل المدن والقرى". قلت: كذا قال الحافظ في "الفتح" ٤ / ٣٨٠ وتبعه الشوكاني ٣ / ١٩٨ أيضا وهو أعم من ذلك فيشمل أهل المياه أيضا فقد روى ابن أبي شيبة أيضا ٢ / ١٠٢ عقب أثر عمر قال: حدثنا ابن إدريس عن مالك قال: "كان أصحاب محمد في هذه المياه بين مكة والمدينة يجمعون". ويشهد له أثر ابن عمر المذكور في الكتاب آخر هذا البحث وقال فيه: "رواه عبد الرزاق بسند صحيح". قلت: كذا قال الحافظ وذكره الشوكاني دون أن ينسبه إليه كغالب تخاريجه واستشهد به المؤلف وفيه ما لا يخفى. وهو في "مصنف عبد الرزاق" ٣ / ١٧٠ / ٥١٨٥ عن عبد الله بن عمر عن نافع عن ابن عمر ... فذكره. كذا وقع فيه: "عبد الله" مكبرا وهو ضعيف فلعل الأصل "عبيد الله مصغرا وهو ثقة بدليل تصحيح الحافظ لإسناده. والله أعلم. قوله في آخر بحث حكم الخطبة نقلا عن الشوكاني: "فالظاهر ما ذهب إليه الحسن البصري وداود الظاهري والجويني من أن الخطبة مندوبة فقط". قلت: بل الصواب وجوبها وما أجاب به الشوكاني مردود وقد نحا نحوه صديق خان في "الروضة الندية" وفي "الموعظة الحسنة" فرددت عليه في رسالتي "الأجوبة النافعة" بما لا يدع إشكالا على القول بوجوبها فراجعه فإنه مهم جدا. ثم ذكر حديث جابر مرفوعا: كان إذا صعد المنبر سلم وضعفه بابن لهيعة ثم ذكره من مرسل الشعبي وعطاء. فأقول: هذان المرسلان أخرجهما ابن أبي شيبة وعبد الرزاق وهما يقويان

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies